|
| Focus group interview themes | Codes | Subcategories | Categories | Component groups |
|
| Use of COPM | Awareness (benefits) (27) | Benefits or limitations expressed by the client or the family: client characteristics (age; physical, cognitive or emotional states; social and cognitive aspects); comprehension of the role of OT; participation of the client; the difficulty of grading; awareness; need and problem identification, and goal setting; and implication in the treatment process. | Advantages: clients and family | Acceptable and appropriate |
| Listening (benefits) (8) |
| The implication/participation in the intervention process (17) | Disadvantages: clients and family |
| Result improvement (10) |
| Characteristics of the client (13) |
| Unawareness of the professional role (3) |
| Emotional state (3) |
| Cognitive deterioration (3) |
| Difficulty in scoring (28) |
| Identification of the problems and goals (15) |
| Institutionalization, conformism (8) |
| Client-centered practice (15) | Benefits or limitations (a) perceived by the professionals: the effectiveness and efficacy of the intervention; occupational performance problem identification; setting the goals; efficiency of the interview; evaluation of the results of the intervention; register of the changes; and decision-making process during the intervention; (b) related to knowledge and skills in CCP; and (c) related to the characteristics of the workplace (contract types, resources available, team, and the role of OT). | Advantages: OT, PT, and the interdisciplinary team |
| Active listening (6) |
| Major dedication to the case/attention quality improvement (20) |
| Professional role and the team (8) | Disadvantages: OT, PT, and the interdisciplinary team |
| Knowledge about the client, his/her needs and goals (16) |
| Competences related to use of the measure (15) |
| Intervention effectiveness/results (6) |
| Personal satisfaction (4) |
| Limitations CCP (11) |
| Environment/institution (6) |
| Resources (8) |
| Availability of time (11) |
| Social health/residencies characteristics (2) | Benefits or perceived limitations related to their institution: philosophy or culture of the center; the grade of the implementation of the CCP; cultural and social levels; job and work organization; general cultural and social levels; resources; and evidence. | Advantages: institution and society |
| Grade of implementation of the CCP (18) |
| Disadvantages: institution and society |
| Generation of the change/evidence (3) |
| Context (6) |
| Resources (14) |
| Social/cultural implications (3) |
|
| Learning process | Characteristics (4) | Characteristics of the process of administration of the measure: How? (during the session, two different sessions, individual patient particularities/reactions, need in adapting the grading process, etc.)
Where? (department, room, with or without family, etc.)
When? (first time, first week, etc.). | Administration process | Practicable |
| Sessions/administration (3) |
| Need in explication/adaptation (7) |
| The time of administration (9) |
| The moment of administration (7) |
| The process of learning (49) | How was the learning process perceived? (changes at the initial stage, initial difficulties, etc.)
Reliability. | Learning process |
| The utility of the information, of the support provided, and of the materials and videos. | Training |
| Interdisciplinary teamwork (26) | The implication of the use of the measure to the teamwork (changes, level of the interest, participation, and renegotiations of the professional limits). | Teamwork process |
|
| Future expectations | Future (55) | Use of the measure starting from the research closure. Application in the center or departments of OT; interest of the center. | Future | Accessible |
| The occasionality of incomes (23) | Includes resources needed for the measure to be used: economic and infrastructure/time/personal/materials. | Resources |
| Professionals resources (7) |
| Infrastructure (7) |
|
