Research Article

Effectiveness of Repetitive Facilitative Exercise Combined with Electrical Stimulation Therapy to Improve Very Severe Paretic Upper Limbs in with Stroke Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of participants.

NMESRFENMES under RFECT value

Number of patients25222626
Age (year)n.s.
Sex (male/female)16/915/719/717/9n.s.
Paralysis side (right/left)11/1412/1013/1312/14n.s.
Days after stroke onsetn.s.
Lesion type (ischemic/hemorrhagic)13/1210/1211/1513/13n.s.
MAS biceps brachii (0/1/1+/2/3)11/12/1/1/010/7/3/2/012/8/3/3/014/8/3/1/0n.s.
 Wrist flexors (0/1/1+/2/3)12/10/3/0/010/9/2/1/09/13/3/1/010/11/4/1/0n.s.
SIAS Knee-Mouth test1.0 [0.0-1.0]1.0 [0.3-2.0]1.0 [0.0-1.0]1.0 [0.0-1.0]n.s.
 Finger-Function test0.0 [0.0-0.0]0.0 [0.0-1.0]0.0 [0.0-1.0]0.0 [0.0-0.0]n.s.
FMA upper limb total score4.0 [4.0-9.0]4.0 [4.0-8.8]4.0 [3.0-8.8]4.0 [4.0-5.8]n.s.
 Shoulder/elbow0.0 [0.0-4.0]0.5 [0.0-5.0]0.0 [0.0-0.8]0.0 [0.0-2.0]n.s.
 Wrist0.0 [0.0-0.0]0.0 [0.0-0.0]0.0 [0.0-0.0]0.0 [0.0-0.0]n.s.
 Finger0.0 [0.0-0.0]0.0 [0.0-0.0]0.0 [0.0-0.0]0.0 [0.0-0.0]n.s.
FIM motor53.0 [40.0-56.0]47.0 [41.0-54.0]37.5 [28.5-50.0]35.5 [28.0-46.0]0.02
 Cognitive27.0 [23.0-30.0]29.0 [19.3-32.8]24.0 [19.0-31.0]24.5 [21.3-27.8]n.s.
 Total76.0 [64.0-90.0]75.0 [65.3-83.3]64.5 [51.3-73.8]58.0 [51.0-72.0]n.s.

NMES: neuromuscular electrical stimulation; RFE: repetitive facilitative exercise; CT: conventional training; MAS: Modified Ashworth Scale; SIAS: Stroke Impairment Assessment Set; FMA: Fugl-Meyer Assessment; FIM: Functional Independence Measure. Continuous data are presented as . SIAS, FMA, and FIM scores are presented as median [lower and upper quartile]. n.s.: not significant; significant differences in FIM motor subscore between CT and NMES ().