Research Article

The Efficacy of a Newly Developed Cueing Device for Gait Mobility in Parkinson’s Disease

Table 2

Pairwise comparisons of all conditions.

ComparisonsVelocity (m/s)Stride length (cm)Cadence (strides/min)
Mean difference valueMean difference valueMean difference value

No cue vs. light−0.238≤0.001−11.1≤0.001−10.530.099
No cue vs. sound−0.289≤0.001−14.2≤0.001−13.000.069
No cue vs. vibration−0.211≤0.001−12.6≤0.001−8.181.000
No cue vs. light and sound−0.266≤0.001−15.5≤0.001−9.700.562
No cue vs. light and vibration−0.264≤0.001−11.70.023−13.260.064
No cue vs. sound and vibration−0.278≤0.001−13.7≤0.001−12.740.035
No cue vs. light, sound, and vibration−0.261≤0.001−15.4≤0.001−10.360.210
Light vs. sound−0.0510.303−3.00.019−2.461.000
Light vs. vibration0.0270.605−1.50.4312.351.000
Light vs. light and sound−0.0280.624−4.30.0250.831.000
Light vs. light and vibration−0.0250.505−0.50.876−2.731.000
Light vs. sound and vibration−0.0400.377−2.60.116−2.201.000
Light vs. light, sound, and vibration−0.0230.607−4.30.0440.171.000
Sound vs. vibration0.0780.0231.50.3874.821.000
Sound vs. light and sound0.0230.608−1.30.5003.301.000
Sound vs. light and vibration0.0260.5702.50.487−0.261.000
Sound vs. sound and vibration0.0110.8280.40.7520.261.000
Sound vs. light, sound, and vibration0.0280.546−1.30.5492.641.000
Vibration vs. light and sound−0.0550.264−2.80.093−1.521.000
Vibration vs. light and vibration−0.0530.2650.10.771−5.081.000
Vibration vs. sound and vibration−0.0670.159−1.10.371−4.561.000
Vibration vs. light, sound and vibration−0.0500.227−2.80.069−2.181.000
Light and sound vs. light and vibration0.0030.9443.80.163−3.561.000
Light and sound vs. sound and vibration−0.0120.7871.70.209−3.041.000
Light and sound vs. light, sound, and vibration0.0050.9010.00.979−0.661.000
Light and vibration vs. sound and vibration−0.0150.621−2.00.4880.521.000
Light and vibration vs. light, sound, and vibration0.0030.934−3.70.2302.901.000
Sound and vibration vs. light, sound, and vibration0.0170.538−1.70.1442.381.000

Significant differences from the pairwise comparisons using Bonferroni correction at .