Research Article

Prevalence and Factors Associated with Drooling in Parkinson’s Disease: Results from a Longitudinal Prospective Cohort and Comparison with a Control Group

Table 4

Factors associated with drooling severity after the 2-year follow-up in the entire cohort (N = 481) and in the PD ≤ 2 y group (N = 127).

βaβb95% CIa95% CIbab

Entire cohort
 Age0.1140.0830.015–0.127−0.001–0.1090.0130.052
 Male0.1120.1360.252–2.1990.568–2.4450.0140.002
 UPDRS-III at V00.2070.0870.060–1.054−0.003–0.093<0.00010.068
 NMSS at V00.3590.4920.039–0.0630.052–0.089<0.0001<0.0001
 PDQ-39SI at V00.240−0.1100.063–1.135−0.098–0.007<0.00010.087
 Change from V0 to V2 in NMSS0.0730.221−0.003–0.1250.020–0.0480.110<0.0001
PD ≤ 2 y group
 UPDRS-III at V01.1210.2721.056–1.1910.038–0.204<0.00010.005
 NMSS at V01.0190.2721.007–1.0320.009–0.049<0.00010.005

Dependent variable: droolingV0+V1+V2 score. β standardized coefficient and 95% IC are shown. aunivariate analysis; bmultivariate analysis; entire cohort, R2 = 0.21; Durbin–Watson test = 1.92; PD ≤ 2 y, R2 = 22; Durbin–Watson test = 1.94. NMSS: Nonmotor Symptoms Scale; PD ≤ 2 y: PD with ≤2 years from symptom onset; PDQ-39SI: 39-item Parkinson’s disease Questionnaire Summary Index; UPDRS: Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale.