Research Article
Association between Cognitive Impairment and Hippocampal Subfield Volumes in Multiple System Atrophy
Table 1
Demographic data and neuropsychological results of all groups.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MSA-CI, cognitively impaired multiple system atrophy; MSA-CP, cognitively preserved multiple system atrophy; eTIV, estimated total intracranial volume; SD, standard deviation; NA, not applicable; UMSARS, Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale; FAB, Frontal Assessment Battery; ACE-III, Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III; WMS-R, Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised; SDS, Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale. aChi-squared test (post hoc chi-squared tests adjusted for multiple comparison: ). bNonparametric test (Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA with the post hoc Steel–Dwass test). cParametric test (one-way ANOVA). dMann–Whitney U test. eStudent’s t-test. |