Research Article
Situational Awareness and Proactive Engagement Predict Higher Time in Range in Adolescents and Young Adults Using Hybrid Closed-Loop
Table 2
Situational awareness and pump behavior correlations with time in range (between-persons).
| | r | values |
| Mean % correct glucose estimate (Q2) | 0.73 | 0.03 | Mean % underestimate glucose (Q2) | −0.73 | 0.02 | Mean % overestimate glucose (Q2) | 0.47 | 0.25 | Mean % correct direction glucose trending (Q3) | 0.27 | 0.33 | Mean % correct prediction 1 hour (Q4) | 0.27 | 0.79 | Mean % underestimate prediction (Q4) | −0.6 | 0.23 | Mean % overestimate prediction (Q4) | 0.57 | 0.27 | Mean # CGM alerts/day | −0.43 | 0.01 | % CGM alerts acknowledged | 0.76 | 0.0001 | Mean number of pump engagements/day | −0.36 | 0.86 | Mean # boluses/day | 0.33 | 0.13 | Total grams of CHO entered into pump/day | 0.18 | 0.07 | Mean # boluses with carb entry/day | 0.39 | 0.05 |
|
|