Hypoglycemia Awareness Trajectories in Young People with Type 1 Diabetes Using Flash Glucose Monitoring
Table 2
Severe hypoglycemia episodes during the first and second year of follow-up.
IAH at baseline (n = 106)
NAH at baseline (n = 119)
p-Value
First year
SH/participant, n (%)
No event
85 (80)
107 (90)
0.031
One event
15 (14)
8 (7)
0.033
More than one event
6 (6)
4 (3)
0.304
Nocturnal event
11 (10)
6 (5)
0.066
Second year
SH/participant, n (%)
No event
93 (88)
110 (92)
0.267
1 event
9 (9)
7 (6)
0.604
More than 1 event
4 (4)
2 (2)
0.423
Nocturnal event
4 (4)
3 (3)
0.709
IAH after 1 year (n = 95)
NAH after 1 year (n = 130)
p-Value
Second year
SH/participant, n (%)
No event
79 (83)
124 (95)
0.003
One event
11 (12)
5 (4)
0.035
More than one event
5 (5)
1 (1)
0.086
Nocturnal event
6 (6)
1 (1)
0.024
Comparisons between participants with IAH and NAH (n = 225). All values are shown as n (%). Comparisons between groups were performed using χ2 test, with Yates’ correction or Fisher’s exact test. Abbreviations: IAH, impaired awareness of hypoglycemia; NAH, normal awareness of hypoglycemia; SH, severe hypoglycemia. Results in bold values are considered as statistically significant.
