The Prevalence and Associated Factors of Impaired Fasting Glucose among Children and Adolescents in Urban China: A Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Study
Table 5
Association of IFG with related factors (N = 7,143).
Variables
Total population
Male
Female
OR (95% CI)
p Value
OR (95% CI)
p Value
OR (95% CI)
p Value
Male sex
Model 1
2.341 (1.767, 3.103)
<0.001
—
—
—
—
Model 2
2.353 (1.774, 3.120)
<0.001
—
—
—
—
Age, per increase of 1 year
Model 1
1.121 (1.078, 1.166)
<0.001
1.120 (1.068, 1.174)
<0.001
1.127 (1.048,1.212)
<0.001
Model 2
1.122 (1.078, 1.167)
<0.001
—
—
—
—
Living in northern China
Model 1
3.261 (2.271, 4.684)
<0.001
3.194 (2.076,4.914)
<0.001
3.430 (1.751,6.717)
<0.001
Model 2
3.041 (2.113, 4.376)
<0.001
3.018 (1,959,4.649)
<0.001
1.105 (1.028,1.188)
0.007
Family history of diabetes
Model 1
1.140 (0.849, 1.532)
0.384
0.842 (0.577, 1.229)
0.373
2.058 (1.250, 3.388)
0.005
Model 2
1.116 (0.829, 1.503)
0.468
0.836 (0.572, 1.222)
0.355
1.959 (1.188, 3.231)
0.008
Maternal education level is university or above
Model 1
0.651 (0.360, 1.177)
0.156
0.690 (0.345, 1.379)
0.294
0.594 (0.187, 1.890)
0.378
Model 2
0.673 (0.371, 1.221)
0.193
0.693 (0.346, 1.388)
0.301
0.625 (0.196, 1.992)
0.427
Sugar-sweetened beverage intake per increase of 250 mL
Model 1
1.181 (1.021, 1.367)
0.025
1.030 (0.844, 1.257)
0.722
1.341 (1.070, 1.681)
0.011
Model 2
1.006 (0.842, 1.201)
0.947
0.890 (0.760, 1.122)
0.324
1.284 (1.010, 1.632)
0.042
Obesity†
Model 1
1.783 (1.239, 2.566)
0.002
1.171 (0.764, 1.793)
0.469
3.006 (1.488, 6.071)
0.002
Model 2
1.647 (1.133, 2.395)
0.009
1.333 (0.865, 2.054)
0.192
3.333 (1.641, 6.772)
0.001
TG, per increase of 1 mmol/L
Model 1
1.349 (1.126, 1.617)
0.001
1.188 (0.918, 1.537)
0.190
1.671 (1.300,2.147)
<0.001
Model 2
1.312 (1.087, 1.583)
0.005
1.092 (0.839, 1.422)
0.513
1.618 (1.254,2.087)
<0.001
TC, per increase of 1 mmol/L
Model 1
1.025 (0.879, 1.195)
0.754
0.950 (0.790, 1.143)
0.588
1.430 (1.094, 1.869)
0.009
Model 2
1.149 (0.986, 1.340)
0.076
1.039 (0.862, 1.253)
0.685
1.356 (1.022, 1.799)
0.035
LDL-C, per increase of 1 mmol/L
Model 1
0.892 (0.714, 1.074)
0.227
0.810 (0.645, 1.016)
0.068
1.200 (0.878, 1.640)
0.253
Model 2
0.979 (0.813, 1.180)
0.825
0.866 (0.689, 1.089)
0.218
1.268 (0.924, 1.739)
0.142
HDL-C, per increase of 0.5 mmol/L
Model 1
0.900 (0.749, 1.082)
0.274
0.935 (0.753, 1.162)
0.547
0.904 (0.644, 1.268)
0.557
Model 2
1.032 (0.857, 1.244)
0.737
1.081 (0.863, 1.353)
0.301
0.928 (0.661, 1.304)
0.668
Note: IFG, impaired fasting glucose; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; HDL-C, high-density cholesterol; LDL-C, low-density cholesterol; OR, odds ratios; †Wasting patients were not included for analysis. Assessed by logistic regression. Model 1: crude OR; Model 2: age and sex were adjusted for in Model 2 when analyzing the associations of potential influencing factors with IFG in total participants. However, in subgroup analyses on the females and males, only age was adjusted for in Model 2. P values <0.05 are presented in bold.
