Research Article
Antinociceptive Effects and Interaction Mechanisms of Intrathecal Pentazocine and Neostigmine in Two Different Pain Models in Rats
Table 1
ED50 and SEM for intrathecally administered pentazocine, neostigmine and in combination in a fixed-dose ratio.
| Group | Drug | Pentazocine component | Neostigmine component | Sum of ED50 fractions | Intrathecal dose (μg) | Fraction of ED50 | Intrathecal dose (μg) | Fraction of ED50 |
| Formalin test Phase I | PEN | 91.1 ± 5.4 | 1.00 | ---- | ---- | | NEO | ---- | ---- | 8.93 ± 0.59 | 1.00 | 1.00 | Formalin test Phase II | PEN | 101.2 ± 6.2 | 1.00 | ---- | --- | | NEO | ---- | --- | 9.20 ± 0.55 | 1.00 | 1.00 | Plantar incision model | PEN | 98.0 ± 5.5 | 1.00 | ---- | ---- | | NEO | ---- | ---- | 10.2 ± 0.55 | 1.00 | 1.00 | Interaction studies | Formalin test Phase I | PEO + NEO | 30.3 ± 2.5 | 0.33 | 2.95 ± 0.30 | 0.33 | 0.66 | Formalin test Phase II | PEO + NEO | 34.4 ± 3.0 | 0.34 | 3.10 ± 0.24 | 0.34 | 0.68 | Plantar incision model | PEO + NEO | 34.0 ± 2.2 | 0.35 | 3.31 ± 0.27 | 0.32 | 0.67 |
|
|
PEN = Pentazocine; NEO = Neostigmine.
|