Research Article
Comparison between Dynamic Stabilization and Instrumented Fusion in the Treatment of Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis
| | Dynesys group (n = 34) | Fusion group (n = 31) | value |
| aVASback | Pre op | 5.3 ± 1.7 | 5.5 ± 1.9 | 0.502 | 6 months postoperative | 2.2 ± 1.2 | 3.2 ± 1.1 | 0.009 | Last follow-up | 2.1 ± 1.0 | 2.8 ± 1.1 | 0.008 | bVASleg | Pre op | 5.6 ± 1.5 | 5.8 ± 1.2 | 0.367 | 6 months postoperative | 1.6 ± 0.4 | 1.7 ± 0.4 | 0.952 | Last follow-up | 1.8 ± 0.5 | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 0.583 | ODI (%) | Pre op | 64.9 ± 16.8 | 63.2 ± 18.3 | 0.550 | 6 months postoperative | 31.2 ± 10.3 | 32.9 ± 11.2 | 0.670 | Last follow-up | 21.8 ± 9.2 | 30.5 ± 10.1 | 0.001 | LSDI (%) | Pre op | 21.6 ± 9.4 | 23.2 ± 10.3 | | Last follow-up | 24.9 ± 9.7 | 40.4 ± 10.4 | 0.001 |
|
|
aVASback VAS scores for back pain, bVASleg VAS scores for leg pain.
|