The Effect of Different Final Irrigation Regimens on the Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Three Different Root Canal Sealers: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Study In Vitro

Table 2

Percentage of penetration and maximum penetration (μm) depth of middle sections ().

			Percentage of penetration (%)		Maximum penetration depth (μm)
			Means	Standard deviation	Means	Standard deviation
AH plus	EDTA	G1A	56.59^a	11.56	366.79^ab	115.87
	EDTA+CHX	G2A	73.78^b	8.83	535.56^b	123.28
	MA	G3A	53.23^a	7.02	526.13^b	159.41
	MA+CHX	G4A	67.85^b	13.25	344.51^a	139.19
	NaOCl	G5A	20.54^c	7.06	265.76^a	118.85
EndoRez	EDTA	G1E	39.26^a	8.70	104.64^a	97.85
	EDTA+CHX	G2E	59.19^b	16.50	596.23^b	246.83
	MA	G3E	42.12^a	15.83	249.59^c	166.60
	MA+CHX	G4E	60.26^b	10.01	259.26^c	89.13
	NaOCl	G5E	11.23^c	7.25	86.38^a	71.05
Tech BioSealer Endo	EDTA	G1T	3.37^a	1.84	17.54^a	3.96
	EDTA+CHX	G2T	33.82^b	16.32	88.49^b	46.25
	MA	G3T	6.97^a	2.88	24.52^a	9.61
	MA+CHX	G4T	52.91^c	17.90	120.91^c	74.70
	NaOCl	G5T	5.34^a	1.18	27.15^a	13.38