Review Article
Nondestructive Testing and Health Monitoring Techniques for Structural Effective Prestress
Table 6
Application scenarios, advantages, and limitations for each method.
| Method | Application scenario | Advantage | Limitation | Engineering application |
| FBG sensor-based method | Preinstalled in newly built structures | High precision and high measuring range | Not suitable for in-service structure | Yes | ME sensor-based method | Preinstalled in newly built structures | High precision, high sensitivity, and fast response | Not suitable for in-service structure, vulnerable to temperature | Yes | Dynamic response-based method | Cable structure | High precision, enabling noncontact measurement | Not suitable for embedded steel strand | Yes | UGW-based method | — | Wide detection range and low signal attenuation | The precision acoustoelastic effect-based method is susceptible to measuring errors in the propagation length | No | EMI-based method | — | Sensitive to local damage | Vulnerable to temperature | No | Electrical resistance-based method | — | High sensitivity and small measuring error | Vulnerable to current heating effect | No |
|
|