Factors Affecting Corporate Security Policy Effectiveness in Telecommuting

Table 8

Results of the model.

Path (hypothesis)		Direct effect			Indirect effect
		Estimate	C.R.^a		Estimate
Specification ⟶ mandatoriness		0.590	8.150
Specification ⟶ extrarole		0.508	3.885
Monitoring ⟶ mandatoriness		0.020	0.615	0.539
Monitoring ⟶ extrarole		0.127	1.539	0.124
Reward ⟶ mandatoriness		–0.012	–0.514	0.608
Reward ⟶ extrarole		0.429	7.397
Perceived severity ⟶ mandatoriness		0.015	0.357	0.721
Perceived severity ⟶ extrarole		0.119	1.119	0.263
Perceived certainty ⟶ mandatoriness		0.033	0.549	0.583
Perceived certainty ⟶ extrarole		–0.138	–0.943	0.346
Moral belief ⟶ mandatoriness		–0.026	–1.163	0.245
Moral belief ⟶ extrarole		–0.083	–1.492	0.136
Mandatoriness ⟶ effectiveness		1.180	9.201
Extrarole ⟶ effectiveness		0.034	0.882	0.378
Specification ⟶ effectiveness					0.794	0.007
Monitoring ⟶ effectiveness					0.039	0.426
Reward ⟶ effectiveness					0.001	0.952
Perceived severity ⟶ effectiveness					0.026	0.592
Perceived certainty ⟶ effectiveness					0.036	0.644
Moral belief ⟶ effectiveness					–0.053	0.124
Model-fit^c	CMIN = 142.987, CMIN/DF = 1.388, , GFI = 0.933, AGFI = 0.889, CFI = 0.988, RMR = 0.051, RMSEA = 0.043, NFI = 0.959, IFI = 0.988

^aC.R. > 1.96; ^b; ^cModel-Fit Reference Value: CMIN/DF (<2), , GFI (≥0.9), AGFI (≥0.85), CFI (≥0.9), NFI (≥0.9), RMR (≤0.1), and RMSEA (≤0.1).