Research Article
Robust Frame Duplication Detection for Degraded Videos
Table 8
The comparison results for the AGN10 group.
| | | v01 | v02 | v03 | v04 | v05 | v06 | v07 | v08 | v09 | v10 | v11 | v12 | v13 | Average |
| | Precision | Ours | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.08 | 0.86 | | Farid [8] | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.54 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.23 |
| | Recall | Ours | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.88 | 0.97 | | Farid [8] | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.33 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.48 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.22 |
| | F1-score | Ours | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.18 | 1.00 | 0.82 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.15 | 0.86 | | Farid [8] | 0.97 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 | | Li [4] | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 0.22 |
|
|
