Image Forgery Detection Using Tamper-Guided Dual Self-Attention Network with Multiresolution Hybrid Feature

Table 6

Robustness evaluation using AUC score over NIST16 and COLUMBIA. Different parameters are tested and Mantra-Net and SPAN are compared to show the performance evaluation.

Image processing	Parameter	NIST16			COLUMBIA
		Mantra-net [9] (%)	S PAN [32] (%)	O URS (%)	Mantra-net [9] (%)	S PAN [32] (%)	O URS (%)
No manipulation	—	78.0	83.9	99.4	77.9	93.6	94.8
Resize	0.78x	77.4	83.2	89.8	69.0	89.9	90.4
Resize	0.25x	75.5	80.3	81.4	68.6	69.0	78.2
Gaussian blur		77.4	83.1	87.7	67.7	78.9	84.1
Gaussian blur		74.5	79.1	79.8	62.8	67.7	73.3
Gaussian noise		67.4	75.1	82.6	68.2	75.1	80.5
Gaussian noise		58.5	67.2	70.3	54.9	65.8	67.2
JPEG compression	QF = 100	77.9	83.5	97.0	75.0	93.3	92.9
JPEG compression	QF = 50	74.3	80.6	88.2	59.3	74.6	87.5