An Efficient Video Encryption Algorithm Based on the Pseudorandom Number Generator of Zipf Distribution

Table 7

Performance comparation (PC1: key space; PC2: resistible to chosen-plaintext attack; PC3: unchanged compression ratio; PC4: separability; PC5: low time complexity).

Algorithms	Encryption position	Cipher technique	PC1	PC2	PC3	PC4	PC5
[3]	IPM, MVD, and QTC	RC4		No	No	No	Yes
[4]	IPM, MVD, and QTC	AES		No	No	No	Yes
[7]	QTC	Logistic chaotic map		No	Yes	No	Yes
[8]	QTC	Scrambling		No	Yes	No	Yes
[10]	MVD and QTC	Logistic chaotic map		No	Yes	No	Yes
[11]	IPM, MVD, and QTC	AES-CTR		No	No	No	Yes
[13]	MVD, QTC, and QP	AES-CTR		No	Yes	No	Yes
[14]	IPM, MVD, QTC, QP, SAO, MVPIdx, MergeIndex, and RefFrmIdx	AES-CTR		No	No	No	Yes
[15]	MVD and QTC	RC6		No	Yes	No	Yes
[17]	MVD, QTC, QP, SAO, part_mode, MergeIndex, and RefFrmIdx	Integer dynamic coupling tent mapping		No	Yes	No	Yes
[21]	IPM, MVD, and QTC	Rabbit or RC4		No	No	No	Yes
[23]	IPM, MVD, QTC,QP, MV ref idx, MV merge idx, MVP idx, and SAO	AES-CTR		No	No	No	Yes
[26]	IPM, MVD, and QTC	AES		No	Yes	Yes	Yes
[29]	NALU header	AES-ECB		No	Yes	Yes	Yes
PSVE	VCL NALU body	3D SCL-HMC chaotic map and AES-CTR		Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes