Texture Synthesizability Assessment via Deep Siamese-Type Network

Figure 6

Examples of textures with their synthesizability scores (under the texture image), human annotations (in the parentheses), and the best synthesis algorithm (also in the parentheses) recommended from Quiliting [20], Graphcut [21], and Random Search [24] by our approach, in which “Null” means none of the three methods work for this texture, and “RS” is for Random Search. (a) Four-leaf clover: 0.89 (1.0, RS). (b) Leopard print: 0.78 (1.0, Quilting). (c) Cherry: 0.68 (1.0, RS). (d) Foam : 0.59 (1.0, Graphcut). (e) Monthly roses: 0.52 (0.5, Quilting). (f) Stones: 0.47 (0.5, Quilting). (g) Pasta: 0.37 (0.0, Graphcut). (h) Cloud: .20 (0.0, Null). (i) Grid road: 0.15 (0.0, Null).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

(h)

(i)