Research Article
Intrusion Detection Method for In-Vehicle CAN Bus Based on Message and Time Transfer Matrix
Table 4
Comparison with other applicable algorithms in terms of accuracy and recall.
| Scheme | Indicator | DoS | Fuzz (%) | Ulterior fuzz (%) | Replay (%) |
| Message and time transfer matrix | Accuracy | 100% | 99.87 | 95.74 | 93.63 | Recall | 100% | 99.89 | 94.34 | 84.67 | ID sequence-based | Accuracy | 100% | 99.64 | 85.09 | 79.65 | Recall | 100% | 98.8 | 44.64 | 17.08 | Hamming distance-based | Accuracy | — | 99.6 | 88.66 | 87.81 | Recall | — | 98.25 | 98.13 | 6.8 | Message-cycle-based | Accuracy | — | 99.21 | 87.56 | 87.05 | Recall | — | 31.09 | 68.1 | 47.49 |
|
|