Research Article
An Improved Self-Training Model with Fine-Tuning Teacher/Student Exchange Strategy to Detect Computer-Generated Images
Table 11
Test results for different dataset-combination settings with attacks to 50% of the testing dataset.
| Model | Accuracy (%) | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | Comb1 | Comb2 | Comb3 | Comb1 | Comb2 | Comb3 | Comb1 | Comb2 | Comb3 |
| M0 | 71.93 | 75.44 | 82.13 | 86.40 | 77.44 | 96.54 | 66.99 | 74.45 | 74.93 | M1 | 84.40 | 82.65 | 91.73 | 91.00 | 83.56 | 94.83 | 80.38 | 82.05 | 89.28 | M2 | 84.85 | 85.04 | 91.25 | 90.09 | 86.44 | 94.96 | 81.53 | 84.08 | 88.39 | M3 | 85.12 | 84.22 | 91.64 | 90.84 | 83.85 | 94.60 | 81.51 | 84.46 | 89.30 |
|
|