Gap between Prediction and Truth: A Case Study of False-Positives in Leakage Detection

<div>The <svg height="10.2124pt" id="M294" style="vertical-align:-3.42943pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -6.78297 7.83752 10.2124" width="7.83752pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M570 304C570 398 525 448 414 448C385 448 343 445 312 434L329 511L321 518C297 504 262 482 244 460L233 411C195 397 159 381 128 358L135 332C160 347 189 360 224 373L111 -147C97 -210 84 -218 17 -231L13 -257L254 -247L259 -218L233 -216C183 -212 177 -202 189 -142L218 -1C238 -10 266 -12 283 -12C351 3 429 48 483 105C543 168 570 242 570 304ZM482 289C482 161 380 33 304 33C278 33 248 51 233 69L303 396C326 400 352 403 369 403C428 403 482 380 482 289Z"></path></g></svg> values of the hypothesis tests on <span class="nowrap"><svg height="13.5999pt" id="M295" style="vertical-align:-4.35069pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -9.24921 24.79 13.5999" width="24.79pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,.144,-.222)"><path d="M470 557C393 591 314 624 246 666H224C156 624 76 591 0 557L12 532C86 550 163 573 235 596C309 572 384 550 458 532L470 557Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M393 379C402 394 400 411 393 422C384 437 365 448 348 448C301 448 237 372 186 285H182L193 335C210 408 205 448 178 448C150 448 80 402 29 344L45 321C80 355 114 373 122 373C128 373 130 365 124 330C106 228 76 98 50 -5L57 -12C82 -5 112 3 132 6L172 203C196 256 234 304 254 329C275 355 293 367 306 367C318 367 330 360 342 348C347 343 355 343 365 350S386 367 393 379Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,4.901,3.132)"><path d="M481 445L456 468C426 437 403 427 388 427C372 427 356 428 302 438C256 447 221 451 187 451C159 451 130 428 105 384C93 363 80 340 65 305L96 290C122 342 149 381 193 381C216 381 267 377 294 374S346 372 365 376L75 105C37 70 24 35 24 16C24 2 30 -5 35 -8C42 -8 46 -6 48 -2C58 14 75 35 90 41C102 46 116 46 147 32C200 8 267 -21 298 -21C347 -21 390 12 448 126L420 151C369 77 338 56 311 56C287 56 249 68 212 81C180 92 149 100 127 98C212 172 353 308 413 372L481 445Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,9.497,3.132)"><path d="M98 134C72 134 46 117 46 90C46 73 55 65 60 64C95 55 124 32 124 -4C124 -42 95 -68 44 -89L57 -123C122 -104 194 -60 194 22C194 94 136 134 98 134Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,11.654,3.132)"><path d="M614 175C564 76 510 21 408 21C256 21 146 149 146 336C146 488 235 629 402 629C510 629 570 586 597 480L626 488C620 541 614 582 606 638C578 643 510 665 429 665C206 665 44 527 44 316C44 157 153 -15 402 -15C474 -15 558 5 586 11C604 45 629 119 643 165L614 175Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,17.706,3.132)"><path d="M687 650H462V622C543 612 549 605 530 547C498 447 422 252 372 126H370C302 298 229 492 204 563C188 607 191 615 262 622V650H17V622C77 616 93 608 122 534C180 389 262 172 329 -11H360C436 196 541 450 568 516C606 605 619 614 687 622V650Z"></path></g></svg>.</span></div>

Security and Communication Networks

tab3

Table 3

Table 3: Gap between Prediction and Truth: A Case Study of False-Positives in Leakage Detection 