Research Article
Intrusion Detection Systems Based on Logarithmic Autoencoder and XGBoost
Table 6
Comparison of the proposed model and other excellent classifiers for CICIDS2017.
| Classifier | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1-score | Time(s) |
| NB-SVM [24] | 0.9892 | 0.9946 | 0.9700 | 0.9821 | — | T-SNERF [25] | 0.9978 | 0.9980 | 0.9980 | 0.9980 | — | MTH-IDS [26] | 0.9989 | 0.9981 | 0.9160 | 0.9989 | 478.2 | LMDRT-SVM2 [27] | 0.9928 | 0.9916 | 0.9939 | 0.9927 | — | DT + rules-based model [28] | 0.9666 | 0.9447 | 0.9886 | 0.9662 | 160.07 | KNN [18] | 0.9630 | 0.9620 | 0.9370 | 0.9630 | 15,243.6 | RF [18] | 0.9882 | 0.9880 | 0.9985 | 0.9880 | 1,848.3 | LogAE-XGBoost | 0.9992 | 0.9971 | 0.9986 | 0.9979 | 1,092.35 |
|
|
It is used to distinguish the metrics of our proposed model from those of other models.
|