Research Article
CRND: An Unsupervised Learning Method to Detect Network Anomaly
Table 4
The evaluation results during linear classification protocol.
| Number of five-tuple | Accuracy (%) | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | False-alarm (%) | F1-score |
| 10 | 82.35 | 89.67 | 68.84 | 6.53 | 0.78 | 50 | 90.49 | 98.17 | 90.46 | 1.24 | 0.88 | 100 | 88.85 | 98.73 | 76.29 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 10,000 | 91.94 | 98.93 | 83.03 | 0.72 | 0.91 |
|
|