Research Article
CRND: An Unsupervised Learning Method to Detect Network Anomaly
Table 5
The evaluation results with CRND as a pretrained model.
| Number of five-tuple | Accuracy (%) | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | False-alarm (%) | F1-score |
| 10 | 90.07 | 98.76 | 79.01 | 0.81 | 0.88 | 50 | 92.06 | 99.24 | 83.06 | 0.53 | 0.90 | 100 | 95.49 | 97.73 | 92.14 | 1.76 | 0.95 | 200 | 96.13 | 99.45 | 91.94 | 0.42 | 0.96 | 500 | 96.49 | 99.37 | 92.83 | 0.49 | 0.96 | 10,000 | 97.18 | 99.66 | 94.08 | 0.26 | 0.98 | 100,000 | 99.59 | 99.83 | 99.26 | 0.14 | 0.99 |
|
|