Research Article
Fashion Evaluation Method for Clothing Recommendation Based on Weak Appearance Feature
Table 6
SVM validation data.
| | Test frequency | Accuracy |
| | 1 | 92.50% | | 2 | 90.00% | | 3 | 90.00% | | 4 | 97.50% | | 5 | 87.50% | | 6 | 92.50% | | 7 | 100.00% | | 8 | 87.50% | | 9 | 90.00% | | 10 | 97.50% | | 11 | 87.50% | | 12 | 97.50% | | 13 | 92.50% | | 14 | 95.00% | | 15 | 82.50% | | 16 | 82.50% | | 17 | 87.50% | | 18 | 95.00% | | 19 | 97.50% | | 20 | 85.00% | | 21 | 90.00% | | 22 | 87.50% | | 23 | 90.00% | | 24 | 97.50% | | 25 | 97.50% | | 26 | 92.50% | | 27 | 95.00% | | 28 | 92.50% | | 29 | 92.50% | | 30 | 100.00% | | 31 | 92.50% | | 32 | 90.00% | | 33 | 92.50% | | 34 | 85.00% | | 35 | 97.50% | | 36 | 90.00% | | 37 | 97.50% | | 38 | 90.00% | | 39 | 85.00% | | 40 | 95.00% | | 41 | 97.50% | | 42 | 95.00% | | 43 | 87.50% | | 44 | 95.00% | | 45 | 100.00% | | 46 | 92.50% | | 47 | 92.50% | | 48 | 92.50% | | 49 | 92.50% | | 50 | 85.00% | | 51 | 92.50% | | 52 | 85.00% | | 53 | 90.00% | | 54 | 95.00% | | 55 | 85.00% | | 56 | 90.00% | | 57 | 85.00% | | 58 | 95.00% | | 59 | 90.00% | | 60 | 97.50% | | 61 | 97.50% | | 62 | 97.50% | | 63 | 92.50% | | 64 | 95.00% | | 65 | 92.50% | | 66 | 82.50% | | 67 | 95.00% | | 68 | 92.50% | | 69 | 92.50% | | 70 | 82.50% | | 71 | 95.00% | | 72 | 92.50% | | 73 | 90.00% | | 74 | 95.00% | | 75 | 97.50% | | 76 | 87.50% | | 77 | 95.00% | | 78 | 92.50% | | 79 | 90.00% | | 80 | 87.50% | | 81 | 97.50% | | 82 | 95.00% | | 83 | 95.00% | | 84 | 92.50% | | 85 | 97.50% | | 86 | 90.00% | | 87 | 92.50% | | 88 | 95.00% | | 89 | 87.50% | | 90 | 92.50% | | 91 | 95.00% | | 92 | 97.50% | | 93 | 97.50% | | 94 | 92.50% | | 95 | 87.50% | | 96 | 87.50% | | 97 | 80.00% | | 98 | 95.00% | | 99 | 92.50% | | 100 | 92.50% | | Average | 92.08% |
|
|