| | Framework | Type | Update | Completeness | Practicability | Tool support | Method support | Summary |
| | Zachman (1987) | EA | 2011
V3 | Middle | Low | No | No | A general framework without specification | | GIM (1988) | EA-PM | No | Middle | Middle | No | Yes | Develop a useful decision making method, GRAI | | PERA (1991) | EA | No | Middle | Middle | No | No | Consider enterprise as facility, organization, and information system | | ARIS (1991) | EIA-IS | 2011
V7.2 | Middle | High | Yes | Yes | MDA and SOA based; consider enterprise integration views as organization, data, function process, and control | | CIMOSA (1993) | EIA | No | Middle | Middle | No | Yes | Clear structured three-dimension framework which are views, models, and levels | | TOGAF (1995) | EA-IS | 2009
V9 | High | High | No | Yes | Architecture of architectures, each part is well detailed | | GERA (1997) | EA | No | High | Low | No | Yes | Enterprise engineering life cycle is well detailed | | FEA (1999) | EA-IS | 2012
V3 | High | High | No | Yes | Organize enterprise by levels: business, design, application, and technology; containing as-is and to-be system modeling | | DoDAF (2003) | EA-IS | 2009
V2.0 | High | Middle | No | Yes | Separates enterprise by viewpoints: all, data and information, standards, capability, operational, services, systems, and project | | IDEAS (2003) | EF | No | Low | Low | No | No | Defines interoperability levels: business, knowledge, and application. The solution is semantics | | AIF (2007) | EF | No | Middle | Middle | No | No | Defines interoperability levels: business, service, process, and data. The solutions are ontology, semantics, and model-driven interoperability | | EIF (2008) | EF | No | High | Middle | No | No | Defines interoperability from interoperability concerns, interoperability barriers, and interoperability approaches |
|
|
