Research Article

Impact on Biometric Identification Systems of COVID-19

Table 1

The summary of the pros and cons of different biometric systems under COVID-19.

Biometric identification methodAdvantages during pandemicDrawbacks during pandemic

Fingerprint recognitionMore accurate compared to other methods; easier for information gatheringThe touching collection machine allows the virus to pass along crowds; to achieve high accuracy, facilities are in need, which adds up the complexity
Palm recognitionProvide a contactless way to identify individualsVariation of the palm line could easily cause face forgery of GAN generated patterns
Face recognitionNontouching methods that are convenient for information gatheringWearing a mask could cause a recognition error
Sclera recognitionNontouching method identifies an individual by only a picture of the scleraNeed high-resolution cameras, which mean higher facility expense; pictures of different angles are needed for recording, which means time-consuming
Stride recognitionOnly need the embedded sensor in the phone to identify gaitRelatively low accuracy rate
Voice recognitionThe noncontact method which allows the machine to identify people without physically in touchThe environmental condition would largely affect the accuracy of the collection machine
Periocular recognitionSimilar to face recognition, a smartphone with a camera embedded could identify individualsTo successfully perform recognition, a higher resolution of the camera and a closer distance might be required
Handwritten signatureProvide another way to solve the identification problem, and it does not need the actual bio-feature of individuals to process, which may have less discomfitNeeds extra handwritten input devices, and the collection of the handwritten script would not be as convenient as other biometric methods
Wrist vein recognitionProvide real-time recognition for noncontact human wrist recognitionRelatively low recognition accuracy