Research Article
An Approach to Study the Poverty Reduction Effect of Digital Inclusive Finance from a Multidimensional Perspective Based on Clustering Algorithms
Table 5
Impact of various financial services of digital inclusive finance on poverty alleviation: transmission mechanism test.
| Path a (without mediators) | POV1 | POV2 | POV3 | (1) | (2) | (3) |
| DIFI | 50.467 | 7.823 | 1.979 | (6.03) | (2.70) | (3.92) | Control variable | Control | Control | Control | Year fixed effect | Control | Control | Control | Province fixed effect | Control | Control | Control | Number of samples | 248 | 248 | 232 | R2 | 0.987 | 0.960 | 0.964 | Path b (mediator) | EDL | EDL | EDL | (4) | (5) | (6) | DIFI | 324.893 | 324.893 | 324.893 | (7.03) | (7.03) | (7.03) | Control variable | Control | Control | Control | Year fixed effect | Control | Control | Control | Province fixed effect | Control | Control | Control | Number of samples | 248 | 248 | 248 | R2 | 0.986 | 0.986 | 0.986 | Path c (including mediators) | POV1 | POV2 | POV3 | (7) | (8) | (9) | DIFI | 16.693 | 4.771 | 0.804 | (2.18) | (1.49) | (1.50) | EDL | 0.104 | 0.009 | 0.004 | (9.99) | (2.16) | (4.81) | Control variable | Control | Control | Control | Year fixed effect | Control | Control | Control | Province fixed effect | Control | Control | Control | Number of samples | 248 | 248 | 232 | R2 | 0.991 | 0.961 | 0.968 | P value of the Sobel test | ≤0.001 | 0.039 | ≤0.001 |
|
|
, , and indicate 10%, 5%, and 1% significance levels. |