The Application of DEMATEL-ANP in Livestream E-Commerce Based on the Research of Consumers’ Shopping Motivation

Cheng, Haonan; Huang, Yi-Ting; Huang, Jesheng

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4487621

Scientific Programming

On this page

Abstract Introduction Literature Review Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

AI-enabled Decision Support System: Methodologies, Applications, and Advancements 2021

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 4487621 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4487621

The Application of DEMATEL-ANP in Livestream E-Commerce Based on the Research of Consumers’ Shopping Motivation

Haonan Cheng,^1,2Yi-Ting Huang,³and Jesheng Huang⁴

Academic Editor: Rahman Ali

Received03 Nov 2021

Accepted17 Dec 2021

Published21 Feb 2022

Abstract

With the rapid development of e-commerce in China and the global pandemic of COVID-19, more and more sales personnel and brands have abandoned the physical retail industry and started investing in e-commerce. The consumer culture of livestream e-commerce is becoming popular in China. However, a report from Southern Finance Omnimedia Corp of China pointed out that among China's top 1,000 livestream sellers, the top 20 sellers have contributed to nearly half of the gross merchandise volume (GMV), using three major Chinese streaming platforms: Taobao, Douyin, and Kuaishou. Moreover, a novice in livestream e-commerce knows less about the important impact factors of the realm. Akin to the adage, “well aware is well prepared,” knowing more about the influencing factors of livestream e-commerce more will be the chances to promote the commercial value. A benchmark research is needed to systematically trace out the most important and influencing factors and to make possible the rising of selling with less effort, hence this study. The research intends to sort out the relevant influencing factors that affect consumers’ shopping motivation in livestream e-commerce by reviewing previous related literature. Then, through the Delphi method, eight experts constructed the 14 main influencing factors that affect consumers’ shopping motivation in livestream e-commerce. Through DEMATEL-ANP, we can not only find the key factors but also sort out the causal relationship between the main key factors, forming a preliminary evaluation model of the commercial value of livestream sellers. The importance-performance analysis (IPA) of these impact factors found that “seller popularity” is the most critical factor affecting consumers’ shopping motivation. At the same time, product discounts, product quality, and the attractiveness of the sellers are being included in effects by the “seller popularity.” The investigation followed in this study revealed that characteristics of the livestream seller are one of the most influencing factor achieving a total weight of 0.3020, whereas the streaming platform is the least influencing factor (total weight is 0.1333). The assessment made the study explore the sustainability of livestream e-commerce in China, and the proposed evaluation model can be used for the preliminary business value evaluation of people engaged in livestream sellers and related industries.

1. Introduction

With the continuous progress of multimedia technology and network technology development, information dissemination has evolved from text to pictures to live video [1, 2]. The audience’s message acceptance mode has also changed from passive acceptance to two-way interaction, and interactions with the publishers of information receive faster feedback. Under the trends of technology, mainstream social media and e-commerce sites (Facebook and China’s Taobao and Douyin) have enabled real-time streaming (live video streaming) [3].

With the popularization of a myriad of streaming media platforms, individuals can do freely produce and publish content. Some users have attracted thousands of followers based on their specific personality traits. They exert great influence on their followers and that is why they are called social media “influencers” (also known as SMIs) [4]. Among opinion leaders, some have more accurate product information and are better accepted and trusted by related groups. They use streaming media technology to conduct live web activities [5, 6]. On social media platforms, live video broadcasts are used to spread information about new products and use it to attract more followers and consumers. They are different from traditional social media opinion leaders since they specialize in using live streaming platforms. These specific online content producers are called livestream sellers [7]. Livestream e-commerce is a new form of influencing consumers' shopping behavior through live broadcasting on streaming media.

Livestream sellers carry out livestream e-commerce through online videos. The live streaming process uses a two-way interactive way to encourage consumers to watch. Consumers can more intuitively immerse themselves in the experience and idea offered by the products are more comprised about these livestream sellers than what they are promoting [8]. According to the latest data from CNNIC, the number of online shopping users in China reached 749 million. As of June 2020, the number of live e-commerce live broadcast users was 309 million. e-Commerce live streaming has become one of the most important online activities [9]. In China, livestream sellers such as Wei Ya, Li Jiaqi, and Luo Yonghao have a huge commercial value. In 2019, Li Jiaqi was named one of the top 50 opinion leaders in China by Forbes. Luo Yonghao attracted 48 million viewers in a live shopping and generated 110 million yuan in revenue [10]. This online activity has become an emerging profession at the moment.

However, according to GMV (gross merchandise volume) data of the 2020 livestream sellers recently announced by China’s three major e-commerce platforms (Taobao, Douyin, and Kuaishou), the top 1,000 sellers have accumulated 255.7 billion yuan in goods. The top 20 sellers have accumulated 106.44 billion yuan in goods, contributing to 41.7% of the top 1,000 sales. However, GMV distribution is still very uneven in the Chinese market [11]. It makes sense to hypothesize that, while many newcomers flock to this industry, most people are at the bottom of it. Therefore, it is of great significance to create a comprehensive evaluation framework to understand better how livestream sellers affect the purchasing motivation of consumers since they have such a huge influence on social business capital [12].

Livestream e-commerce aims at introducing one or more products through livestream sellers and showing them to consumers through a live broadcast hosted in streaming media platform. Under the explanation of livestream sellers and the interaction with consumers, that have generated purchase motivation and produced new purchase behaviors. After confirming the order, the manufacturer then delivers the product to the consumer to be evaluated, ultimately generating the commercial value. Therefore, in this complete consumption process, the main participants are the product providers, the livestream sellers, the streaming media platforms, and the consumers.

While e-commerce livestream has gradually grown into emerging consumer culture in China, it has begun to attract scholars’ attention in recent years. Some scholars have already proposed methods to investigate livestream e-commerce but those are limited. A number of studies have been published in recent years to focus on the fact that a single influencing factor or multiple influencing factors have a certain relationship with consumers’ purchasing motivation [10, 13–17]. However, this concept is not clear enough to fully understand the industry practice. There is no way to form a comprehensive evaluation framework for the live streaming industry. There’s no strong explanation for the extremely unbalanced GMV distribution of the existing livestream sellers. Secondly, there is a lack of paired comparison system between impact factors in the current live streaming industry. Particularly, those who enter the industry do not know which impact factors they should focus on to better promote their commercial value of livestream sellers. We urgently need an evaluation standard to evaluate the commercial value of livestream sellers, so that people entering this industry can correctly judge and estimate it. This will reduce the market manipulation phenomenon in the live streaming industry.

In summary, we explore the following issues in this research:

RQ1: what key factors do livestream sellers use to influence shopping motivation?

RQ2: what are the dimensions of livestream sellers affecting consumers’ shopping motivation and what is the weight of each key factor under different dimensions established?

RQ3: what is the causal relationship between the key factor affecting shopping motivation?

RQ4: what are the key factors that should be prioritized to improve consumer satisfaction?

RQ5: what is the reason for the uneven distribution of GMV of livestream sellers among the major e-commerce platforms in China? Based on this research, what are the recommendations for decentralization for the sustainable livestream e-commerce cultural industry?

The rest of the article is organized in 6 sections. In Section 2, the literature review is presented. The details about the research method are covered in Section 3. Section 4 deals with the research results, whereas in Section 5, a detailed discussion is presented. Possible limitations of the framework are elaborated in Section 6. Conclusion and future work are presented in Section 7.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Livestream E-Commerce and Livestream Sellers

After 2010, live streaming media, a multimedia entertainment method based on interactivity, was rapidly popularized worldwide [18]. Live e-commerce shopping is an activity developed based on this multimedia entertainment. Previous academic studies [19] discussed how virtual immersive technology can increase sales innovation. Live shopping was taken as an independent concept in [20] to explore the relationship between e-commerce shopping and consumers in terms of utilitarianism and hedonism. In [13], the authors noted that live e-commerce shopping could reduce consumers’ psychological distance and perceived uncertainty, thereby increasing their online purchasing. Another study [3] used the structural equation research method and took the Facebook platform as an example to explore how live e-commerce live shopping can establish a trust relationship between consumers and livestream sellers. [14] discussed the consumer behavior promoted in live broadcasts based on the theory of uses and gratifications (U&G).

2.2. Theater Theory

Because the shopping behavior of live e-commerce is an interactive relationship between livestream sellers and consumers through the streaming media platform, it is essentially a comprehensive service marketing experience. The key to success lies in whether the livestream sellers can impress consumers through the display on the network platform. This article adopts the theater theoretical framework proposed by [21]. This framework was applied to the service marketing experience by [22] and to interactions with consumers in the service experience by [23].

In the case of live shopping on Taobao, the livestream sellers are actors and include all of the personal characteristics in their role as anchor. Consumers who watch live shopping are the audience. Taobao’s live streaming mainly provides the environment for consumer and livestream sellers to participate in live broadcasts. The performance dimension includes the livestream seller's behavior in this performance, the product form, and process, as shown in Figure 1.

2.3. Actors and Performances: The Role of SMIs in livestream E-Commerce

How do livestream sellers, as the main actors in live e-commerce shopping shows, influence consumers through their personal charm and performance? With the rapid development of social media today, it is a common phenomenon for companies to cooperate with social media influencers (SMIs). Companies use SMIs on social media platforms to promote their brands and products [6]. According to [24], SMIs have several types of marketing influence on social media platforms. The first is their language style, which includes the aspects of specificity, precision, interactivity, and intimacy (relevance), and the second is taste. In another study [25], the taste is defined as aesthetic ability. It is believed that SMIs should have taste leadership to lead consumers’ taste. According to [6], it is easier for SMIs to gain trust than other KOLs, and SMIs have more content expertise and professional knowledge of products [26]. Another key factor is the number of followers, which is based on the SMI’s popularity [6, 27].

2.4. Theater and Performance: Why Consumers Should Use Livestream E-Commerce to Shop

The livestream e-commerce platform is the stage for the performance. Why should consumers use this platform? Based on previous academic research findings [28], the reason why people use social networking platforms has to do with their we-intentions, attitudes, social interactions, entertainment, and social enhancement [29, 30]. [31, 32]. In the research [33, 34], the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) is introduced. The technology acceptance theory [35] has been widely used in the study of new information technology since its development. Studies like [36–38] have also been carried out to explain why consumers use e-commerce platforms for consumption.

2.5. Audience and Performance: Perceived Value of Consumers

In the live e-commerce shopping link, how do ordinary viewers perceive the value of products and services? Thaler first proposed transaction utility theory [39]. Thaler [40] claimed that the perceptual value is the consumer’s subjective judgment, which determines the value of a product. As described in Zeithaml’s research, saving money (product discounts), saving time, service quality, and product diversity are the main considerations when consumers are calculating the perceived value [41]. According to [42], the perceptual value has two dimensions, experience value and practical value, where the former is related to the entertainment, overall visual, indulgent, and interactive nature of the product, and the latter is related to saving money (product discounts), saving time, service quality, and diversity.

2.6. Dimensions and Related Influencing Factors of Livestream Sellers in E-Commerce Live Shopping That Affect Consumers’ Purchasing Motivation

Following the theater theory, in this research, we used each aspect as a search keyword and found relevant papers on the influencing factors of each of the aspects in the WOS and Scopus literature databases, as described in Sections 2.2–2.5. The key factors described in the relevant literature that affect consumers’ shopping motivation are shown in Table 1.

3. Research Methods

As shown in Table 1, we verified that live e-commerce shopping is a complex marketing activity that involves a combination of multiple objects and links. The influencing factors mentioned here are directly related to each other. For example, trust in the livestream sellers is intertwined with trust in the platform, and consumer interaction also depends on the interactivity of the livestream sellers. This is why it can be challenging to separately explain the specific relationship between influencing factors through previous research methods.

Based on exploring how livestream sellers affect consumers’ shopping motivation, as well as the overview and analysis of the existing research, this research first established a comprehensive evaluation framework regarding how livestream sellers influence consumers' shopping motivation during livestream e-commerce shopping by collecting opinions of relevant personnel in the industry.

In order to find the main influencing factors contained in each aspect, this study adopted a modified Delphi method [75]. Delphi is an expert group decision-making method. Experts were tasked with scoring semistructured questionnaires to determine the specific factors that affect consumers’ purchasing motivation in live e-commerce activities.

According to [76], DEMATEL can solve complex and tangled problems and sort out the relationships between various influencing factors. Therefore, in the study, we used DEMATEL technology to enhance our understanding of the multifactorial problem of live e-commerce shopping. The ANP method was used to normalize the matrix relationship generated by the influencing factors to test the weight between various influencing factors [77]. Different from the traditional combination of these two methods, the DANP method based on the DEMATEL results can be directly used as an unweighted super-matrix, avoiding the need for cumbersome pairwise comparison in traditional ANP technology [78, 79]. Due to the excessive fatigue load of the questionnaire respondents, the question of consistency tests the questionnaire results [80]. The purpose is to determine the causality of influencing factors through the traditional DEMATEL method and at the same time use ANP to calculate the weights of various aspects and influencing factors, so as to create a complete live e-commerce shopping evaluation system that affects consumers’ shopping motivation (Figure 2).

3.1. Delphi Method: Find Main Influencing Factors That Affect Consumers’ Purchasing Motivation in Livestream E-Commerce

According to the focus of this research, previous literature on e-commerce, e-commerce shopping, SMI, and livestream shopping, a series of influencing factors that might affect consumers’ shopping motivation on livestream links are found in Table 1. In order to determine the main influencing factors, we found eight experts who are closely related to the industry and formed a group, as shown in Table 2. During the visit, the experts were given a semistructured questionnaire in which they scored the influencing factors listed in Table 1 based on importance (0–100). The higher the score, the higher the importance. The consensus difference threshold set by the expert group was CDI <0.1 [75]. In stage 1, the experts were asked to score the importance of factors related to the dimensions in the questionnaire.

3.2. DANP: Investigate Degree of Correlation between Influencing Factors

3.2.1. Questionnaire Test

According to the unanimous suggestion of the experts, this study selected 120 college students, professionals, and practitioners in related fields who had three or more live e-commerce shopping experiences as the main group for this survey. Before filling out the questionnaire, the meaning of the dimensions and related influencing factors were again explained to ensure that the subjects accurately understood their content.

3.2.2. Scoring Scale

According to [81], DEMATEL is mostly designed on a scale of 0–5. However, due to the large number of test questions in this study, in order to prevent confusion for the subjects in the process of comparing criteria, we adopted the questionnaire used in the study of [82] for DANP and used 0–3 points as the scoring scale, as shown in Table 3.

3.2.3. DEMATEL Analysis

The algorithm to obtain weight from a super-matrix is given as follows:

Step 1. Generate the direct influence matrix.(i) = influencing factor, where represents the degree of influencing criteria.(ii)Let, impact range = {0, 1, 2, 3, 4}(iii), where n represents the number of criteria.(iv), where denotes the average value.(v)For n number of criteria, the direct influence matrix is given as

Step 2. Calculate normalized matrix.(i)Let .(ii)Let and .(iii)Nm = , where Nm denotes the normalized matrix.

Step 3. Calculate the total impact matrix.(ii),(iii)T_im = , where T_im represents the total impact matrix.

Step 4. Generate weighted matrix.(i)Let, = , where represents the unweighted super-matrix and is the total influence matrix.(ii) = Go to Step 2 passing as argument, where denotes the normalized total influence matrix.(iii)W = .

Step 5. Generate limit of super-matrix.(i)From . Repeat = , where is an explicitly defined constant and is the super-matrix limit to obtain the weight of each element.

3.2.4. Calculate Importance and Relevance

Each column of the total influence matrix can be summed up to obtain the D value, and each row can be summed up to obtain the R value. The sum of rows and columns (D + R) of each element is the importance, which represents the strength of influence of various factors in the final problem. The difference between each element's rows and columns (D–R) is the degree of association. If the rank difference is positive, then this influencing factor is biased toward active influence as the cause; if the rank difference is negative, it is biased toward affected as the result.

3.3. IPA: Analyze Advantages and Disadvantages of Various Factors That Affect Consumers’ Shopping Motivation

Importance-performance analysis (IPA) is a method that was proposed by [83] for comparing relative positions of items. While conducting the DANP questionnaire, we asked the participants to rate their satisfaction with the performance value of each influencing factor (full score is 100 points). Finally, we obtained the average score of all participants’ performance satisfaction for each influencing factor. IPA allows us to understand the advantages and disadvantages of the various factors that influence consumers’ purchasing motivation in livestream e-commerce according to the relevant participants [84]. Finally, the importance (D + R) calculated by DANP was taken as the vertical axis and the respondents’ performance scores for each influencing factor were taken as the horizontal axis of the two-dimensional quadrant. The average scores of importance and influencing factors were taken as two cutting lines, forming four performance areas: possible overkill, low priority, concentrate here, and keep up the good work [83, 85, 86].

4. Research Results

4.1. Determining the Formal Live E-Commerce Shopping Evaluation Framework That Affects Consumers’ Shopping Motivation

The evaluation framework of livestream sells influencing consumers’ shopping motives in live e-commerce shopping links was established after two rounds of Delphi questionnaires. After listening to some of the experts’ suggestions in the first round of the expert questionnaire, “live broadcast time” was added as an influencing factor in the performance dimension. The consensus was not reached in the first round. Based on expert opinions and the results of the first round of questionnaires, a new impact factor scale was developed, and the second round of questionnaires was initiated. In order to ensure the validity and consistency of the matrix comparison, a limited number of impact factors should be included [87]. Therefore, after the agreement of the expert group, a consensus was reached in the second round of questionnaires. We retained the impact factors with an average of 70 points and above, and included 14 key impact factors. The CDI values of the evaluation criteria for the 14 impact factors were all <0.1. Based on the results of the second round, the impact factor scale was once again formulated, and the results are shown in Table 4.

4.2. The Importance and Weight of Key Factors Affecting Various Aspects of Consumer Shopping Motivation in Livestream E-commerce

Based on a paired comparison questionnaires from 120 participants in the first test, 102 valid questionnaires were recovered, the average value of each pairwise comparison was calculated according to the arithmetic mean method, and the direct influence matrix A was obtained, as shown in Table 5.

According to the above formula, the matrix was transformed into normalized total influence matrix T, as shown in Table 6.

After summing each column of the total influence matrix to unity, they were self-multiplied three times to obtain a limiting super-matrix containing the weight of each aspect and influencing factors. The result after sorting is shown in Table 7.

According to the total influence matrix, the importance (D + R) and relevance (D–R) of each influencing factor are finally obtained, as shown in Table 8.

The importance ranking of influencing factors calculated by DEMATEL and the weight ranking of influencing factors calculated by ANP are used to count the votes by the Borda count method to obtain the final sequence of importance, shown in Table 9, as the final importance ranking of this research.

4.3. Establishing a Network Causality Diagram

In order to clarify the causal relationships between the various influencing factors, total influence matrix T is used to simplify them, taking the maximum value in each row. Similar to the multiple regression equation, the independent variable with the largest impact strain is taken to select the top seven major influencing factors in DEMATEL and draw a network causality diagram, as shown in Figure 3.

It can be seen from Figure 3 that the popularity of the livestream sellers and trust in the sellers are the two most important factors, and they have a mutual influence relationship. However, because the (D–R) value of the seller’s popularity is positive, it is a relationship that actively influences others, so it is the most important source in the cause and effect diagram.

4.4. Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA)

At the same time as the DANP questionnaire, we also collected the IPA questionnaire, collecting 108 in total, and obtained a performance satisfaction value of 14 influencing factors in the live e-commerce shopping process, represented on the Y-axis. The importance weight of (D + R) in DEMATEL was used as the X-axis. The average importance of 14 factors is 14.66. The average performance is 80.42 as the center line of the X-axis and Y-axis, and the final result is shown in Figure 4 and Table 10.

5. Discussion

This research uses the theater theory as the basic theoretical framework to sort out 24 influencing factors that may have an impact on consumers’ shopping motivation. Later, through the Delphi method suggested by eight experts in the industry, the 14 influencing factors affecting the shopping motivation of the anchors with the goods were screened out. Some of them are livestream sellers’ popularity, product discounts, livestream sellers’ attractiveness, trust, and product quality. Product popularity, host taste, live broadcast time, product diversity, service quality, subjective attitude, platform convenience, host audience interaction, overall vision, and popularity are the most influencing factors, with a weight of 0.0808. All weights are shown in Table 7.

We found through the framework of the theater theory that seller characteristics are very influential, with a weight value of 0.302. Ki and Zhang et al. [13, 25] both verified that in the live shopping process of livestream transactions, the personal characteristics of the sellers have a strong influence on consumers’ shopping motivation.

It is very interesting that according to this research, the weight of the consumer’s perceived value dimension is lower than that of the livestream seller characteristic dimension, and the weight of the perceived value is 0.2986. Compared with the perceived value of the product itself, the role characteristics of livestream sell can trigger consumers’ motivation to purchase the product. We will explain this point later.

The weight ratio of the streaming platform aspect is relatively low, only 0.1333. This also shows that Chinese consumers are generally traditional to online shopping compared with traditional TV shopping, and online platform live shopping is already a fairly common form of shopping in China. In addition, the impact of streaming platforms on consumers is relatively small.

The performance aspect is a relatively controllable feature in which livestream sellers can make technical improvements directly after entering the industry. The weight value of this variable is 0.2662. This aspect is related to whether a livestream seller who is new to the industry can quickly generate commercial value by improving their own technology.

5.1. High Importance and Low Satisfaction

In the livestream e-commerce field, the key factors are livestream sellers’ popularity, product discounts, anchor trust, and product quality. [6] Their research pointed out that popular Internet celebrities have a more significant influence on consumers. However, Internet celebrities with a large popularity may not be the best marketing choice to promote different products. However, we have verified that livestream sellers are different from traditional Internet celebrities. To mobilize consumers’ shopping motivation, they must increase their popularity, improve product quality, and lower product prices. In Figure 3, we can see that the popularity of livestream sellers is the source of causality. The livestream sellers Wei Ya and Li Jiaqi, who benefit from the live broadcast e-commerce, had entered the industry early as 2016, when the e-commerce livestream field was still in its embryonic stage. They have the initial exposure, and the support from the platform is what helped them achieve their current commercial value. Moreover, the famous livestream seller Luo Yonghao, who entered the Douyin platform in March 2020, was once a talk show actor in China, and also the CEO of Smartisan, so he already had a certain foundation. Taobao recruited more than 300 Chinese film and television stars for live streaming in June 2020. The names chosen by the brand were also already popular in China.

Hence, apart from the popularity of livestream sellers, can discounts and product quality also improve consumers’ purchasing motivation? Hou et al. [59] mentioned that consumers’ perception of product discounts and product quality can improve their purchasing motivation. However, as shown in Figure 3, we found that both aspects are affected by the sellers’ popularity. In other words, merchants only provide the best quality products and the most favorable discounts to the most popular livestream sellers. In this case, it can be said that the reliability and popularity of livestream sellers interact with each other. So, the most popular livestream sellers need to find the best products to increase their trust in consumers, since they have a strong sense of trust in the seller.

5.2. High Importance and High Satisfaction

The attractiveness of livestream sellers and product awareness are among the most influencing factors. These two influencing factors have high satisfaction for consumers, but satisfaction can be subjective and vary according to these factors. This is the part that needs to be maintained in the entire e-commerce live shopping process. According to Figure 3, product awareness is affected by the popularity of livestream sellers, which is the source influencing factor. Therefore, as a merchant, in order to maintain and improve the popularity of their products and occupy a larger chunk of market, they need sufficient motivation to provide their products at the most favorable price to popular livestream sellers. Generally, the higher the seller attractiveness is, the higher the seller popularity should be. As real two elements influence with each other. In fact, the average score of satisfaction against seller popularity is 79.4 points and that of seller attractiveness is 84.4 points, indicating that customers have more demand for seller popularity. In other words, for top livestream sellers, you only need to maintain the existing seller attractiveness.

5.3. Causality of High-Importance Factors

From the perspective of the entire high-importance factor, live streaming has formed a closed loop centered on the popularity of livestream sellers. The product discount and product quality in the consumer’s perception of the product are completely determined by the livestream seller’s popularity. In other words, if a new livestream seller just entered the industry, it might be very challenging to build a new space in it without a previous popularity base.

5.4. Low Importance and Low Satisfaction

We can see that “service quality” and “seller-customer interaction” are not as important, but, for consumers, satisfaction is low. A large number of studies have pointed out that the intensity of interaction between livestream sellers and consumers have a direct impact on consumers’ purchasing motivation [17, 24, 25, 30, 42, 68–70]. The outcomes of this research pointed out that quality of service and the interaction between the seller and the customer are less important than the aforementioned key factors; however, the satisfaction of consumers is low. At the same time, according to Figure 3, improving service quality can also increase consumer trust in livestream sellers. For livestream sellers with insufficient popularity, improving service quality and increasing interaction with consumers are very limited feasible means that can increase the commercial value of livestream sellers.

After expert advice, we added the impact factor “live broadcast time,” which was not used in previous studies. Through empirical research, we found that consumers’ satisfaction with live broadcast time is still relatively acceptable at this stage. According to Figure 3, it can be seen that the (D-R) value of time is −0.1558, which is a passive influencing factor. That is, as the popularity of the livestream seller increases, they must maintain a certain amount of live broadcast time to increase consumers’ trust. In fact, top livestream sellers such as Li Jiaqi, Wei Ya, and Luo Yonghao usually create 2–4 hours of live content, which indirectly affects their popularity. So, it can be said that maintaining a certain amount of live broadcast time is an indispensable factor for improving consumers’ shopping motivation.

5.5. Low Importance and High Satisfaction

The taste and product diversity of livestream sellers are high for consumers. Ki et al. [25] reflected out that improving the taste ability of livestream sellers has an impact on consumers’ purchasing motivation. McQuarrie & Phillips [42, 43] also verified that increasing the customer’s choice dimension can improve consumers’ purchasing motivation. However, our results showed that, in live shopping, the importance of taste and product diversity of is slightly less important than the other six influencing factors. However, in China’s multiple live streaming platforms, we can also see that many livestream sellers have entered the segmented product field that is suitable to their own personal characteristics. This is the best strategy to increase the customer’s choice dimension and at the same time improve the sellers’ possibility so they can grow in the industry. For example, there are livestream sellers of special liquors and livestream sellers of outdoor specialties.

Subjective attitudes and platform convenience belong to the dimensions of streaming platforms. According to a research on China’s mobile e-commerce market, subjective attitudes and platform convenience have a positive effect on consumers’ use of mobile e-commerce platforms [25]. However, we have observed that e-commerce live shopping is different from the previous e-commerce consumption model. Intended to the rapid development of large e-commerce sites such as Taobao and JD.com, Chinese consumers got used to this new consumption model of online shopping. In the process of moving from the traditional e-commerce model to e-commerce live shopping, most consumers can fully recognize and adapt to the new streaming platforms of related websites. Several streaming platforms often carry out livestream activities at the same time to pursue the maximum exposure of livestream sellers.

6. Possible Limitations

As actors in an emerging type of industry, it can be quite challenging for livestream sellers to build their way into it. The results of this study may trigger new research questions that can be further verified, for example, how to avoid top livestream sellers from manipulating the e-commerce market, so that more people can engage with it can engage with it? Is it possible to intervene with other influencing factors to prevent new sellers from finding unfair competition among the most popular ones? This research provides reference suggestions for other scholars and researchers who want to enter the field. However, livestream e-commerce is an emerging field, the sampling scope of this study is limited to mainland China, so the outcomes presented here are limited. In addition, based on the comprehensive consideration of the overall sample data, this study is specific to different consumer groups. And for livestream sellers, the weights of the impact factor will be different.

7. Conclusions and Future Work

At present, since the COVID-19 pandemic is still affecting the world, the physical retail industry continues to decline. More and more consumers are turning to e-commerce, since physical transactions are constantly affected by the restrictions brought by the health crisis. Many people who enter the live streaming delivery industry have insufficient knowledge of the livestream e-commerce industry, so they waste lot of time and capital. From the perspective of consumers’ shopping motivation, this research builds on the theater theory often used in the service experience to construct four major influence dimensions and important influence factors for better understanding the commercial value of livestream sellers. This research is more focused on establishing a comprehensive judgment standard for evaluating the commercial value of livestream sellers. Through an in-depth analysis of the 14 impact factors and its respective weights, combined with the causal relationship between the main impact factors, this study brings useful information for livestream sellers who want to enter the industry, so they can make preliminary business value judgments based on their own circumstances.

At the same time, this study sorts out the relationship between the factors that livestream sellers have on consumers' shopping motivation. This study points out that the popularity of livestream sellers is a key factor to be considered when entering the industry. This study explored that the uppermost task is to accumulate sellers’ popularity before they enter the industry and boost sellers’ trust at the same time. Later, they can get the most favorable product discount. Meanwhile, they can also select the relevant subdivisions based on their fans’ characteristics. Therefore, the personal features of livestream sellers are more important than consumers’ perception of the value of online goods. We have also found that the fan characteristics of livestream sellers can be used to select relevant subdivisions. And also to improve seller’s taste and product diversity in this field to generate more purchasing motivation, improving the interactive relationship between livestream sellers and customers and the quality of service are also effective means to create more motivation.

In the overall e-commerce livestream industry, livestream sellers are data producers. This study finds that if the platform traffic recommendation is made by using the popularity click rate as the only measurement metrics, it is easy to cause overcentralization of the industry. Therefore, for streaming platforms, it is possible to enhance the popularity of a certain category of anchors by manifesting the correlation between the content that reflects the taste of related products and the activities of anchors for the category of goods, so as to achieve the effect of industry decentralization and facilitate the sustainable development of the livestream industry as a whole.

As the international livestream e-commerce continues to mature, this basic evaluation framework can provide ideas for research related to subfields in the future. As our future strategy, we are determined to enhance the framework and to apply it on other cyber-related domains.

Data Availability

No data were used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Hao-Nan Cheng, Jesheng Huang, and Yi-Ting Huang conceptualized and designed the study; Hao-Nan Cheng collected and analyzed the data; Hao-Nan Cheng wrote the manuscript; and Jesheng Huang provided guidance and revised the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

References

P. R. Todd and J. P. Melancon, “Gender and livestream: source credibility and motivation,” Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, vol. 12, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Bargh and K. Y. A. McKenna, “The internet and social life,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 573–590, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Wongkitrungrueng and N. Assarut, “The role of live streaming in building consumer trust and engagement with social commerce sellers,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 117, pp. 543–556, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. W. Ki, L. M. Cuevas, S. M. Chong, and H. Lim, “Influencer marketing: social media influencers as human brands attaching to followers and yielding positive marketing results by fulfilling needs,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 55, Article ID 102133, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. S. Chua, H. Luan, M. Sun, and S. Yang, “Next: nus-tsinghua center for extreme search of user-generated content,” IEEE Multimedia, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 81–87, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. D. Veirman, V. Cauberghe, and L. Hudders, “Marketing through Instagram influencers: the impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude,” International Journal of Advertising, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 798–828, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Lou, S. Chen, Y. Jia, and X. Yu, “Business group affiliation and R&D investment: evidence from China,” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1–16, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. C. Chen and Y. C. Lin, “What drives live-stream usage intention? The perspectives of flow, entertainment, social interaction, and endorsement,” Telematics and Informatics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 293–303, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. N. N. I. C. Statistical, “Survey report on the internet development in china,” 2020, https://cnnic.com.cn/IDR/ReportDownloads/202012/P020201201530023411644.pdf.
View at: Google Scholar
F. J. Martínez-López, R. Anaya-Sánchez, M. Fernández Giordano, and D. Lopez-Lopez, “Behind influencer marketing: key marketing decisions and their effects on followers’ responses,” Journal of Marketing Management, vol. 36, pp. 579–607, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. L. J. S. Wei, 2020 Live Broadcasting Trend Report-Top 100 Anchor Influence Rankings, Xiaohulu, Shanghai, China, 2021.
A. Küper and N. C. Krämer, “Influencing factors for building social capital on live streaming websites,” Entertainment Computing, vol. 39, Article ID 100444, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zhang, F. Qin, G. A. Wang, and C. Luo, “The impact of live video streaming on online purchase intention,” Service Industries Journal, vol. 40, no. 9-10, pp. 656–681, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Ma, “To shop or not: understanding Chinese consumers' live-stream shopping intentions from the perspectives of uses and gratifications, perceived network size, perceptions of digital celebrities, and shopping orientations,” Telematics and Informatics, vol. 59, Article ID 101562, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Lu and Z. Chen, “Live streaming commerce and consumers' purchase intention: an uncertainty reduction perspective,” Information & Management, vol. 58, no. 7, Article ID 103509, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Xu, J. H. Wu, and Q. Li, “What drives consumer shopping behavior in live streaming commerce?” Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 21, pp. 144–167, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Kang, J. Lu, L. Guo, and W. Li, “The dynamic effect of interactivity on customer engagement behavior through tie strength: evidence from live streaming commerce platforms,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 56, Article ID 102251, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Needleman, “Twitch’s viewers reach 100 million a month,” The Wall Street Journal, vol. 29, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Pantano and R. Servidio, “Modeling innovative points of sales through virtual and immersive technologies,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 279–286, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Cai, D. Y. Wohn, A. Mittal, and D. Sureshbabu, “Utilitarian and hedonic motivations for live streaming shopping,” in Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video, pp. 81–88, SEOUL, Republic of Korea, June 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Grove, R. P. Fisk, and M. J. Bitner, “Dramatizing the service experience: a managerial approach,” Advances in Services Marketing and Management: Research and Practice, vol. 1, JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut, USA, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Lovelock and P. Patterson, Services Marketing, Pearson Australia, Melbourne, Australia, 2015.
S. J. Grove and R. P. Fisk, “The impact of other customers on service experiences: a critical incident examination of “getting along”,” Journal of Retailing, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 63–85, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. T. Lee and C. Theokary, “The superstar social media influencer: exploiting linguistic style and emotional contagion over content?” Journal of Business Research, vol. 132, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
C. W. C. Ki and Y. K. Kim, “The mechanism by which social media influencers persuade consumers: the role of consumers' desire to mimic,” Psychology and Marketing, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 905–922, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. White and J. J. Argo, “When imitation doesn't flatter: the role of consumer distinctiveness in responses to mimicry,” Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 667–680, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. A. Jin and J. Phua, “Following celebrities' tweets about brands: the impact of twitter-based electronic word-of-mouth on consumers' source credibility perception, buying intention, and social identification with celebrities,” Journal of Advertising, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 181–195, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. K. Cheung, P.-Y. Chiu, and M. K. O. Lee, “Online social networks: why do students use facebook?” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1337–1343, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Xu, S. Ryan, V. Prybutok, and C. Wen, “It is not for fun: an examination of social network site usage,” Information & Management, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 210–217, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. L. Hsu, J. C. C. Lin, and Y. F. Miao, “Why are people loyal to live stream channels? The perspectives of uses and gratifications and media richness theories,” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 351–356, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Gan and H. Li, “Understanding the effects of gratifications on the continuance intention to use WeChat in China: a perspective on uses and gratifications,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 78, pp. 306–315, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Li, Y. Liu, X. Xu, J. Heikkilä, and H. D. Van, “Modeling hedonic is continuance through the uses and gratifications theory: an empirical study in online games,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 48, pp. 261–272, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Singh, N. Singh, Z. Kalinić, and F. J. C. Liébana, “Assessing determinants influencing continued use of live streaming services: an extended perceived value theory of streaming addiction,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 162, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Chao, “Factors determining the behavioral intention to use mobile learning: an application and extension of the UTAUT model,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 10, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 319–340, 1989.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Cheema, M. Rizwan, R. Jalal, F. Durrani, and N. J. Sohail, “The trend of online shopping in 21st century: impact of enjoyment in TAM Model,” Asian Journal of Empirical Research, vol. 3, pp. 131–141, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
K. M. S. Faqih and M. I. R. M. Jaradat, “Assessing the moderating effect of gender differences and individualism-collectivism at individual-level on the adoption of mobile commerce technology: TAM3 perspective,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 22, pp. 37–52, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Saricam, “Acceptance of apparel private sale sites by consumers: application of original and extended technology acceptance model,” Journal of the Textile Institute, vol. 106, no. 10, pp. 1059–1070, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Thaler, “Transaction utility theory,” NA - Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 10, 1983.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Thaler, “Mental accounting and consumer choice,” Marketing Science, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 199–214, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. A. Zeithaml, “Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 2–22, 1988.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. J. Lee and J. W. Overby, “Creating value for online shoppers: implications for satisfaction and loyalty,” Journal of Consrrmer Salirfaciiun, Dissatisfacn'or and Complaining Behavior, vol. 17, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
E. F. McQuarrie and B. J. Phillips, “The megaphone effect in social media: how ordinary consumers become style leaders,” GfK Marketing Intelligence Review, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 16–20, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. F. McQuarrie, J. Miller, and B. J. Phillips, “The megaphone effect: taste and audience in fashion blogging,” Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 136–158, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Lou and S. Yuan, “Influencer marketing: how message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media,” Journal of Interactive Advertising, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 58–73, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Martensen, S. S. Brockenhuus, and A. L. Zahid, “How citizen influencers persuade their followers,” Journal of Fashion Marketing and Managementm, vol. 22, no. 3, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
I. Azjen, “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 50, pp. 179–211, 1991.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Tuomela, “Joint intention, we-mode and I-mode,” Midwest Studies In Philosophy, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 35–58, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Mazer, R. E. Murphy, and C. J. Simonds, “I’ll see you on “facebook”: the effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate,” Communication Education, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Bailey, I. Pentina, A. S. Mishra, and M. S. B. Mimoun, “Mobile payments adoption by us consumers: an extended tam,” International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, vol. 45, no. 6, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Sun and T. Chi, “Key factors influencing the adoption of apparel mobile commerce: an empirical study of Chinese consumers,” Journal of the Textile Institute, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 785–797, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. M. Dholakia, R. P. Bagozzi, and L. K. Pearo, “A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based virtual communities,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 241–263, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Eighmey, “Profiling user responses to commercial web sites,” Journal of Advertising Research, vol. 37, pp. 59–67, 1997.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Dong and T. Wang, “Social tie formation in Chinese online social commerce: the role of IT affordances,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 42, pp. 49–64, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Oyedele and P. M. Simpson, “Streaming apps: what consumers value,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 41, pp. 296–304, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Abdullah, R. Ramli, H. O. Bakodah, and M. Othman, “Developing a causal relationship among factors of e-commerce: a decision making approach,” Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1194–1201, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Chang, W. Cheung, and M. Tang, “Building trust online: interactions among trust building mechanisms,” Information & Management, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 439–445, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. D. Lynch, R. J. Kent, and S. S. Srinivasan, “The global internet shopper: evidence from shopping tasks in twelve countries,” Journal of Advertising Research, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 15–23, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Hou, Z. Guan, B. Li, and A. Y. L. Chong, “Factors influencing people’s continuous watching intention and consumption intention in live streaming: evidence from china,” Internet Research, vol. 30, no. 1, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Caminal and X. Vives, “Why market shares matter: an information-based theory,” The RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 221–239, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Song, S. Sawang, J. Drennan, and L. J. I. T. Andrews, “People. same but different? mobile technology adoption in china,” Information Technology & People, vol. 28, no. 1, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
S. K. Lam, M. Ahearne, Y. Hu, and N. Schillewaert, “Resistance to brand switching when a radically new brand is introduced: a social identity theory perspective,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 128–146, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. B. Bhattacharya and S. Sen, “Consumer-company identification: a framework for understanding consumers' relationships with companies,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 76–88, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Severi, K. C. Ling, and A. Nasermoadeli, “The impacts of electronic word of mouth on brand equity in the context of social media,” International Journal of Business and Management, vol. 9, pp. 84–96, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Stubb and J. Colliander, “This is not sponsored content - the effects of impartiality disclosure and e-commerce landing pages on consumer responses to social media influencer posts,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 98, pp. 210–222, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. W. Treem and P. M. Leonardi, “Social media use in organizations: exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association,” Annals of the International Communication Association, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 143–189, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Dong, T. Wang, and I. Benbasat, “It affordances in online social commerce: conceptualization validation and scale development,” in Proceedings of the Twenty-second Americas Conference on Information Systems, San Diego, CA, USA, August 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Ryu and L. Feick, “A penny for your thoughts: referral reward programs and referral likelihood,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 84–94, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Umashankar, M. K. Ward, and D. W. Dahl, “The benefit of becoming friends: complaining after service failures leads customers with strong ties to increase loyalty,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 79–98, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Luo, M. Zhang, M. Hu, and Y. Wang, “How community interactions contribute to harmonious community relationships and customers' identification in online brand community,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 673–685, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Y. C. Yim, S. C. Chu, and P. L. Sauer, “Is augmented reality technology an effective tool for E-commerce? An interactivity and vividness perspective,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, vol. 39, pp. 89–103, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Sun, X. Shao, X. Li, Y. Guo, and K. Nie, “How live streaming influences purchase intentions in social commerce: an IT affordance perspective,” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, vol. 37, Article ID 100886, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Caroux, K. Isbister, L. Le Bigot, and N. Vibert, “Player-video game interaction: a systematic review of current concepts,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 48, pp. 366–381, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Moliner, D. Monferrer-Tirado, and M. Estrada-Guillén, “Consequences of customer engagement and customer self-brand connection,” Journal of Services Marketing, vol. 32, no. 4, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
J. W. Murry and J. O. Hammons, “Delphi: a versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research,” The Review of Higher Education, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 423–436, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Tzeng, C. Chiang, and C. Li, “Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1028–1044, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. L. Saaty, Decision making with dependence and feedback: The analytic network process, RWS publications Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 1996.
Y. P. O. Yang, H. M. Shieh, J. D. Leu, and G. H. Tzeng, “A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications,” International Journal of Operational Research, vol. 5, pp. 160–168, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Y. Chiu, G. H. Tzeng, and H. L. Li, “A new hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR to improve e-store business,” Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 37, pp. 48–61, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Okoli and S. D. Pawlowski, “The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications,” Information & Management, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 15–29, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. H. Tzeng and J. J. Huang, Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, CRC Press, FL, USA, 2011.
C. H. Hsu, F. K. Wang, and G. H. Tzeng, “The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 66, pp. 95–111, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Martilla and J. C. James, “Importance-performance analysis,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 77–79, 1977.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Matzler, F. Bailom, H. H. Hinterhuber, B. Renzl, and J. Pichler, “The asymmetric relationship between attribute-level performance and overall customer satisfaction: a reconsideration of the importance-performance analysis,” Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 271–277, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. A. Graf, M. Hemmasi, W. J. L. Nielsen, and O. D. Journal, “Importance‐satisfaction analysis: a diagnostic tool for organizational change,” Leadership & Organization Development Journal, vol. 13, no. 6, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
M. L. Daniels and J. L. Marion, “Visitor evaluations of management actions at a highly impacted Appalachian Trail camping area,” Environmental Management, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1006–1019, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Dong, T. L. Saaty, and S. Engineering, “An analytic hierarchy process model of group consensus,” Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 362–374, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Haonan Cheng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies