Research Article
Design and Implementation of University Students Scientific Research Ability Evaluation System Based on Neural Network
Table 2
Comparison of the predicted results of different models with the expected results.
| Expected results | Expected output | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.77 | 0.93 | 0.85 | 0.84 | Expected level | Excellent | Good | Excellent | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Good |
| Gradient descent | Actual output | 0.9358 | 0.6857 | 0.7584 | 0.8628 | 0.7628 | 0.9225 | 0.8728 | 0.8357 | Actual level | Excellent | Good | Excellent | Good | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Good | Matching? Yes/No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Quasi-Newton method | Expected level | 0.8635 | 0.6837 | 0.7386 | 0.8634 | 0.7658 | 0.9228 | 0.9048 | 0.8672 | Actual output | Excellent | Good | Excellent | Good | Excellent | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Actual level | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Our algorithm | Expected level | 0.9247 | 0.9124 | 0.8627 | 0.8857 | 0.7735 | 0.9338 | 0.8535 | 0.8446 | Actual output | Excellent | Good | Excellent | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Good | Actual level | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|