Research Article
Named Entity Recognition for Public Interest Litigation Based on a Deep Contextualized Pretraining Approach
Table 3
Comparison of experimental effects between various models (NER category).
| Methods | P | R | F1 |
| CRF [34] | 67.7 | 68.7 | 68.2 | BiLSTM-CRF [34] | 69.8 | 70.6 | 70.2 | WL-BiLSTM-CRF [34] | 70.8 | 71.6 | 71.2 | CNN-BiLSTM-CRF [35] | 72.2 | 72.2 | 72.2 | BERT-FC [36] | 75.5 | 71.7 | 73.5 | BERT-WWM-FC | 77.8 | 72.6 | 75.1 | BERT-WWM-EXT-FC | 75.3 | 75.9 | 75.6 | RoBERTa-FC | 74.3 | 68.3 | 71.2 | RoBERTa-WWM-FC | 74.3 | 69.3 | 71.7 | RoBERTa-WWM-EXT-FC | 75.8 | 70.0 | 72.8 | ALBERT-FC | 73.8 | 64.0 | 68.6 | ALBERT-tiny-FC | 68.7 | 52.9 | 59.8 |
|
|
The bold values mean the optimal values among all the methods.
|