Research Article
Named Entity Recognition for Public Interest Litigation Based on a Deep Contextualized Pretraining Approach
Table 5
Comparison of effects between various models (NERP category).
| Methods | P | R | F1 |
| BERT-FC [36] | 72.0 | 72.8 | 72.4 | BERT-BiLSTM-CRF [36] | 89.0 | 89.0 | 89.0 | BERT-WWM-EXT-BiLSTM-CRF (proposed method) | 89.3 | 90.7 | 90.0 | RoBERTa-FC | 72.3 | 67.8 | 70.0 | RoBERTa-BiLSTM-CRF | 85.2 | 89.5 | 87.3 | RoBERTa-WWM-EXT-BiLSTM-CRF | 88.7 | 87.9 | 88.3 | ALBERT-FC | 66.2 | 67.4 | 66.8 | ALBERT-BiLSTM-CRF | 88.0 | 88.4 | 88.2 |
|
|
The bold values mean the optimal values among all the methods.
|