A Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method on the Construction of High-Level Universities Based on Data from Jiangsu Province

Table 5

Basic credibility and scores of second-level index.

Second-level index	Basic credibility and scores of second-level index				Score
	Good	General	Relatively poor	Poor
Material resources	0.55639	0.28571	0.15038	0.00752	0.87669
Funding input	0.55868	0.38409	0.05722	0.00000	0.90029
Faculty quality	0.55331	0.39670	0.04999	0.00000	0.90066
The situation of university discipline construction	0.55177	0.31196	0.13627	0.00000	0.88310
Quality of student source and cultivation	0.43526	0.24893	0.29168	0.02412	0.81424
Teaching output	0.48448	0.27071	0.24480	0.00000	0.84794
Scientific research input	0.67188	0.30647	0.02165	0.00000	0.93004
Scientific research output	0.61794	0.28172	0.10034	0.00000	0.90352
Scientific research output efficiency	0.69824	0.23007	0.07168	0.00000	0.92531
Service contribution	0.54224	0.34210	0.11220	0.00346	0.88393
Social ranking	0.60795	0.24813	0.12994	0.01398	0.88722
International communication and cooperation	0.48614	0.30613	0.19792	0.00981	0.85176