Research Article

Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery (MIPS) for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Medical Management: A Case Series Comparison for a Single Institution

Table 1

Demographic and preclinical data for the full sample and by treatment group: medical management versus minimally invasive parafascicular surgery (MIPS).

VariablesFull sample
()
Medical management
()
MIPS
()
value

Patient demographics
 Age years (SD)63
(14.5)
64
(14.6)
61
(14.7)
0.53
 Male, (%)21
(49)
13
(50)
8
(47)
0.85
 Black, (%)30
(70)
21
(81)
9
(53)
0.11
Preclinical characteristics
 Diabetes, (%)6
(14)
3
(12)
3
(18)
0.67
 Modified Rankin scale (mRS) score on admission median (IQR)4
(3, 5)
4
(3, 5)
4
(3.5, 5)
0.62
 Glascow coma scale score (GCS) on admission median (IQR)12
(9, 13)
11.5
(9, 13.2)
11.3
(9.5, 13.5)
0.95
 Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) mean (SD)11.2
(4.6)
10.9
(4.6)
11.7
(4.8)
0.58
 Intracerebral Hemorrhage Scale score median (IQR)2
(1, 2)
2
(1, 3)
2
(1, 2)
0.42
 Prevolume, ml median (IQR)36.3
(28, 50)
36.3
(26, 49)
36.4
(29, 58)
0.87
Stroke type0.40
 Basal ganglia, (%)21
(49)
13
(50)
8
(47)
 Lobar stroke, (%)19
(44)
10
(38)
9
(53)
 Thalamic, (%)3
(7)
3
(12)
0
Location0.94
 Left, (%)23
(54)
14
(54)
9
(53)
 Right, (%)20
(40)
12
(46)
8
(33)
Intraventricular hemorrhage, (%)15
(35)
9
(35)
6
(35)
0.96