Research Article
Improvement of Roller Bearing Diagnosis with Unlabeled Data Using Cut Edge Weight Confidence Based Tritraining
Table 7
Classification error rate of initial and final hypothesis and the corresponding improvements of tritraining under different unlabeling rate.
| Case | Unlabeling rate of 0.8 | Unlabeling rate of 0.6 | Unlabeling rate of 0.4 | Unlabeling rate of 0.2 | Initial | Final | Improvement | Initial | Final | Improvement | Initial | Final | Improvement | Initial | Final | Improvement |
| Case 1 | 0.2167 | 0.1833 | 15.41% | 0.1500 | 0.1333 | 11.13% | 0.0667 | 0.0654 | 1.95% | 0.0533 | 0.0520 | 2.44% |
| Case 2 | 0.3684 | 0.2832 | 23.13% | 0.3632 | 0.3205 | 11.73% | 0.2559 | 0.2105 | 17.74% | 0.2105 | 0.2000 | 4.99% |
|
|