Research Article
Improvement of Roller Bearing Diagnosis with Unlabeled Data Using Cut Edge Weight Confidence Based Tritraining
Table 8
Comparative diagnosis results of SVM and BPNN in Case
1.
| Classifier | Unlabeling rate of 0.8 | Unlabeling rate of 0.6 | Unlabeling rate of 0.4 | Unlabeling rate of 0.2 | Initial | Final | Improvement | Initial | Final | Improvement | Initial | Final | Improvement | Initial | Final | Improvement |
| BPNN | 0.1670 | 0.1367 | 18.14% | 0.0790 | 0.0757 | 4.18% | 0.0613 | 0.0600 | 2.12% | 0.0500 | 0.0487 | 2.60% |
| SVM | 0.3001 | 0.2617 | 12.80% | 0.1697 | 0.1652 | 2.65% | 0.1267 | 0.1250 | 1.34% | 0.0833 | 0.0783 | 6.00% |
|
|