Research Article
Numerical Study on the In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Resistance of Brick Masonry Infill Panels in Steel Frames
Table 5
Seismic response comparison for the considered infill walls subjected to earthquake excitations with various frequency contents.
| Specimen | Excitation | PGD (mm) | PGA (g) | = 1.0 | = 0.75 | = 0.6 | PWD (mm) | PWA (g) | PWD (mm) | PWA (g) | PWD (mm) | PWA (g) |
| Case III | 50% | Manjil | 20.5 | 0.222 | 35.4 | 0.418 | 39.0 | 0.377 | 40.2 | 0.361 | 75% | Manjil | 30.8 | 0.332 | 51.7 | 0.425 | 56.1 | 0.371 | 59.7 | 0.369 | 100% | Manjil | 41.0 | 0.443 | 77.1 | 0.523 | 85.0 | 0.455 | 93.3 | 0.441 | 150% | Manjil | 61.5 | 0.665 | 80.1 | 0.463 | Failure | NA | Failure | NA |
| Case III | 100% | Trinidad | 8.9 | 0.194 | 13.5 | 0.256 | 14.1 | 0.241 | 14.1 | 0.241 | 200% | Trinidad | 17.7 | 0.387 | 30.7 | 0.297 | 31.7 | 0.310 | 33.5 | 0.286 | 300% | Trinidad | 26.6 | 0.581 | 44.0 | 0.369 | 47.9 | 0.329 | 50.7 | 0.313 | 400% | Trinidad | 35.5 | 0.774 | 52.8 | 0.334 | 57.3 | 0.327 | 58.3 | 0.315 |
|
|