Research Article
Degradation State Identification of Cracked Ultrasonic Motor by Means of Fault Feature Extraction Method
Table 3
The first 5 groups of test data’s PDD statistics in each degradation state.
| Group number | PDD to normal state | PDD to slight degradation | PDD to severe degradation | PDD to failure state | Identification results | Judgement |
| 1 | 0.0744 | 0.1573 | 0.3542 | 0.6758 | Normal state | Right | 2 | 0.0687 | 0.1128 | 0.4031 | 0.6743 | Normal state | Right | 3 | 0.0956 | 0.1254 | 0.3755 | 0.6392 | Normal state | Right | 4 | 0.0842 | 0.1363 | 0.3687 | 0.6654 | Normal state | Right | 5 | 0.0659 | 0.1124 | 0.3255 | 0.6171 | Normal state | Right | 41 | 0.1706 | 0.0990 | 0.2498 | 0.5751 | Slight degradation | Right | 42 | 0.1032 | 0.0776 | 0.2960 | 0.5255 | Slight degradation | Right | 43 | 0.1277 | 0.0619 | 0.2342 | 0.5506 | Slight degradation | Right | 44 | 0.1046 | 0.1155 | 0.2585 | 0.5699 | Normal state | Wrong | 45 | 0.1197 | 0.0463 | 0.2224 | 0.5861 | Slight degradation | Right | 81 | 0.3052 | 0.2650 | 0.1047 | 0.3786 | Severe degradation | Right | 82 | 0.3531 | 0.2497 | 0.0639 | 0.4257 | Severe degradation | Right | 83 | 0.3285 | 0.2651 | 0.0449 | 0.3880 | Severe degradation | Right | 84 | 0.3250 | 0.2661 | 0.0758 | 0.4068 | Severe degradation | Right | 85 | 0.3417 | 0.2873 | 0.0362 | 0.3649 | Severe degradation | Right | 121 | 0.6126 | 0.5602 | 0.3374 | 0.0632 | Failure state | Right | 122 | 0.5838 | 0.5263 | 0.3997 | 0.1069 | Failure state | Right | 123 | 0.6296 | 0.5654 | 0.3511 | 0.0962 | Failure state | Right | 124 | 0.5378 | 0.4982 | 0.3729 | 0.0512 | Failure state | Right | 125 | 0.5743 | 0.5148 | 0.3364 | 0.0837 | Failure state | Right |
|
|