Research Article

Degradation State Identification of Cracked Ultrasonic Motor by Means of Fault Feature Extraction Method

Table 3

The first 5 groups of test data’s PDD statistics in each degradation state.

Group numberPDD to normal statePDD to slight degradationPDD to severe degradationPDD to failure stateIdentification resultsJudgement

10.07440.15730.35420.6758Normal stateRight
20.06870.11280.40310.6743Normal stateRight
30.09560.12540.37550.6392Normal stateRight
40.08420.13630.36870.6654Normal stateRight
50.06590.11240.32550.6171Normal stateRight
410.17060.09900.24980.5751Slight degradationRight
420.10320.07760.29600.5255Slight degradationRight
430.12770.06190.23420.5506Slight degradationRight
440.10460.11550.25850.5699Normal stateWrong
450.11970.04630.22240.5861Slight degradationRight
810.30520.26500.10470.3786Severe degradationRight
820.35310.24970.06390.4257Severe degradationRight
830.32850.26510.04490.3880Severe degradationRight
840.32500.26610.07580.4068Severe degradationRight
850.34170.28730.03620.3649Severe degradationRight
1210.61260.56020.33740.0632Failure stateRight
1220.58380.52630.39970.1069Failure stateRight
1230.62960.56540.35110.0962Failure stateRight
1240.53780.49820.37290.0512Failure stateRight
1250.57430.51480.33640.0837Failure stateRight