Research Article
An Optimal Algorithm for Planning Shearer Trailing Drum Cutting Path
Table 1
Comparison of the two advancing methods (unit: m2).
| Sample point | Optimal cut | Memory cut | Optimization rate | Floor dinting area | Retaining bottom coal area | Total | Floor dinting area | Retaining bottom coal area | Total |
| a | 0.0197 | 0.0170 | 0.0369 | 0.0784 | 0.0356 | 0.1140 | 67.61% | b | 0.0165 | 0.0134 | 0.0299 | 0.0186 | 0.0638 | 0.0825 | 63.78% | c | 0.0016 | 0.0228 | 0.0244 | 0.0425 | 0.0170 | 0.0596 | 58.95% | d | 0.0090 | 0.0147 | 0.0238 | 0.2911 | 0 | 0.2911 | 91.84% | E | 0.0406 | 0.0158 | 0.0564 | 0 | 0.4308 | 0.4308 | 86.92% | F | 0.0141 | 0.0127 | 0.0269 | 0.0321 | 0 | 0.0321 | 16.26% | g | 0.0094 | 0.0067 | 0.0161 | 0 | 0.0854 | 0.0854 | 81.12% | h | 0.0096 | 0.0155 | 0.0251 | 0 | 0.1663 | 0.1663 | 84.88% | i | 0.0183 | 0.0200 | 0.0383 | 0.0184 | 0.1361 | 0.1545 | 75.24% | j | 0.0068 | 0.0130 | 0.0198 | 0.0405 | 0 | 0.0405 | 51.15% | Average | 0.0146 | 0.0152 | 0.0298 | 0.0522 | 0.0935 | 0.1457 | 67.78% 79.58% |
|
|