Research Article

Safety Assessment of Ancient Buildings under Adjacent Subway Blasting Construction Based on the Optimized Fuzzy Optimal Method

Table 2

The score criteria of the risk.

0∼2 (V)2∼4 (IV)4∼6 (III)6∼8 (II)8∼10 (I)

U11StableRelatively stableRelatively fragileFragileExtremely fragile
U12The Old Stone AgeThe Neolithic AgeAncient timesModern times
U13National levelProvincial levelCity levelCounty levelTownship level
U14Grotto structureBrick masonry structureMasonry-timber structureStone structureTimber structure
U15Good durabilityRelatively good durabilityRelatively bad durabilityBad durabilityExtremely bad durability
U16>25 m20–25 m15–20 m10–15 m<10 m
U17>100000 m210000–100000 m21000–10000 m2100–1000 m2<100 m2
U184th level3rd level2nd level1st level
U19Much largerLargerApproximately equalLessMuch less
U21Dynamic compactionPilingCars, city trainsSubwayTrain
U22<4 Hz4-7 Hz7–110 Hz10–13 Hz>13 Hz
U23ConcentratedRelatively concentratedRelatively sporadicSporadicExtremely sporadic
U24ReasonableRelatively reasonableRelatively unreasonableUnreasonableExtremely unreasonable
U251500 m/s2100–1500 m/s2900–2100 m/s5600–2900 m/s>5600 m/s
U26UndergroundOverground
U27<100 m100–400 m400–700 m700–1000 m>1000 m
U31StrictRelatively strictGeneralRelatively freeFree
U32StrongRelatively strongGeneralRelatively weakWeak
U33StrongRelatively strongGeneralRelatively weakWeak
U34StrongRelatively strongGeneralRelatively weakWeak