Research Article

Comprehensive Evaluation of Blast Casting Results Based on Unascertained Measurement and Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set

Table 2

The grading and quantitative standards of qualitative indicators for evaluating blast casting results.

LevelBlast casting resultAssignmentFragmentation distributionMuck pile shapeBoulder generationDestruction degree of coal seam benchDust pollution

IPoor1Fragmentation distribution is extremely unreasonableMuck pile is loose and shape is unreasonableToo much boulder is generated and secondary crushing should be doneCoal seam is extremely damagedExtremely high dust concentration and extremely serious pollution

IIGeneral2Fragmentation distribution basically meets the requirementsMuck pile shape basically meets the requirementsToo much boulder is generatedCoal seam is seriously damagedHigh dust concentration and serious pollution

IIIWell3Fragmentation distribution is reasonableMuck pile is relatively concentratedLess boulder is generated and individual needs crushing properlyCoal seam is basically well preservedLow dust concentration and moderate pollution

IVVery well4Fragmentation distribution is fairly uniformMuck pile is concentrated, and the shape reasonableBoulder is not generatedCoal seam is intact and undamagedLower dust concentration and light pollution