Assessing Seismic Performance of Gantry Crane Subjected to Near-Field Ground Motions Using Incremental Dynamic and Endurance Time Analysis Methods

Table 2

Summary of selected near-field records.

ID No.	Earthquake			PGA (g)	Recording station	(km)
	Name	Year	Magnitude, M
1	Imperial Valley-02	1940	6.95	0.2807955	El Centro array #9	6.09
2	Irpinia_Italy-01	1980	6.9	0.129652	Bagnoli Irpinio	8.18
3	Corinth_Greece	1981	6.6	0.236771	Corinth	10.27
4	Loma Prieta	1989	6.93	0.2852704	Gilroy – historic bldg.	10.97
5	Cape Mendocino	1992	7.01	0.1167631	Fortuna – Fortuna blvd.	19.95
6	Landers	1992	7.28	0.2735839	Joshua Tree	11.03
7	Northridge-01	1994	6.69	0.3450987	Arleta – Nordhoff Fire Sta	8.66
8	Kobe_Japan	1995	6.9	0.1845571	Fukushima	17.85
9	Kocaeli_Turkey	1999	7.51	0.2100834	Arcelik	13.49
10	Chi-Chi_Taiwan	1999	7.62	0.1742769	CHY010	19.96
11	Duzce_Turkey	1999	7.14	0.107237	Lamont 1058	0.21
12	Hector Mine	1999	7.13	0.2654663	Hector	11.66
13	Cape Mendocino	1992	7.01	0.1773806	Bunker Hill FAA	12.24
14	Tottori_Japan	2000	6.61	0.25177	SMN001	14.42
15	Montenegro_Yugoslavia	1979	7.1	0.1832788	Ulcinj – Hotel Albatros	4.35
16	Chuetsu-oki_Japan	2007	6.8	0.1881915	Joetsu Ogataku	17.93
17	Iwate_Japan	2008	6.9	0.2886351	IWT010	16.27
18	El Mayor-Cucapah_Mexico	2010	7.2	0.2484907	Chihuahua	19.47
19	Darfield_New Zealand	2010	7	0.1857917	Canterbury Aero Club	14.48
20	Duzce_Turkey	1999	7.14	0.2822281	IRIGM 487	2.65

Note: means the closest distance to rupture the plane.