Research Article
Research and Application of Rock Burst Hazard Assessment of the Working Face Based on the CF-TOPSIS Method
Table 1
Evaluation criterion system of rock burst grade.
| Evaluating indicators | Weak | Mid | Strong | 8003 working face |
| The same level of coal seam rock burst history times (times) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | Mining depth h (m) | 400 | 600 | 800 | 647 | The distance d between the hard thick strata and the coal seam in the overlying fracture zone | 100 | 50 | 20 | 15.85 | Ratio of stress increment to normal stress in the mining area (%) | 10 | 20 | 30 | 17.3 | Uniaxial pressure resistance (MPa) | 10 | 14 | 20 | 10.3 | Elasticity index | 2 | 3.5 | 5 | 1.58 | Relationship between the working face and adjacent goaf | 1 side goaf | 2 side goaf | 3 side goaf | 1 side goaf | Working face length (m) | 300 | 150 | 100 | 290 | Section coal pillar width (m) | 3 | 6 | 10 | 48 | Bottom coal thickness (m) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
|
|