Biochemical Aspects of a Serine Protease from <i>Caesalpinia echinata</i> Lam. (Brazilwood) Seeds: A Potential Tool to Access the Mobilization of Seed Storage Proteins

Praxedes-Garcia, Priscila; Cruz-Silva, Ilana; Gozzo, Andrezza Justino; Abreu Nunes, Viviane; Torquato, Ricardo José; Tanaka, Aparecida Sadae; Figueiredo-Ribeiro, Rita de Cássia; Gonzalez, Yamile Gonzalez; Araújo, Mariana da Silva

doi:https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/562715

The Scientific World Journal

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results and Discussion Conclusion Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 | Article ID 562715 | https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/562715

Biochemical Aspects of a Serine Protease from Caesalpinia echinata Lam. (Brazilwood) Seeds: A Potential Tool to Access the Mobilization of Seed Storage Proteins

Priscila Praxedes-Garcia,¹Ilana Cruz-Silva,¹Andrezza Justino Gozzo,¹Viviane Abreu Nunes,²Ricardo José Torquato,¹Aparecida Sadae Tanaka,¹Rita de Cássia Figueiredo-Ribeiro,³Yamile Gonzalez Gonzalez,⁴and Mariana da Silva Araújo¹

Academic Editor: M. Song, R. B. Petersen

Received28 Oct 2011

Accepted25 Dec 2011

Published02 May 2012

Abstract

Several proteins have been isolated from seeds of leguminous, but this is the first report that a protease was obtained from seeds of Caesalpinia echinata Lam., a tree belonging to the Fabaceae family. This enzyme was purified to homogeneity by hydrophobic interaction and anion exchange chromatographies and gel filtration. This 61-kDa serine protease (CeSP) hydrolyses H-D-prolyl-L-phenylalanyl-L-arginine-p-nitroanilide ( 55.7 μM) in an optimum pH of 7.1, and this activity is effectively retained until C. CeSP remained stable in the presence of kosmotropic anions (, , and ) or chaotropic cations (K⁺ and Na⁺). It is strongly inhibited by TLCK, a serine protease inhibitor, but not by E-64, EDTA or pepstatin A. The characteristics of the purified enzyme allowed us to classify it as a serine protease. The role of CeSP in the seeds cannot be assigned yet but is possible to infer that it is involved in the mobilization of seed storage proteins.

1. Introduction

Peptidases or proteases are essential molecules for the survival of all organisms as they can be involved in many aspects of development, physiology, defense, stress responses, and adaptation to the changes of environment. Also, proteolytic enzymes regulate protein processing and intracellular protein levels and remove either abnormal or damaged proteins from the cell, working as a cellular housekeeper [1].

Serine proteases are the best-characterized group of proteolytic enzymes in mammals and microorganisms. In recent years several of those enzymes have been isolated from various plant species, mainly from their seeds such as trypsin-like peptidases from Glycine max [2] and Canavalia ensiformis [3, 4], protease C1 from Glycine max [5], proteinase F from Vigna radiata [6], and subtilisin-like peptidases from Glycine max [7].

Caesalpinia echinata Lam. is a species of the Fabaceae (Leguminosae) family native in Brazilian forests that has been included in the list of species at risk of extinction [8]. Since 2000, our group has studied protein components from C. echinata seeds and we have already purified two serine protease inhibitors from them. C. echinata kallikrein inhibitor (CeKI) is able to inhibit human plasma kallikrein, plasmin, factor XIIa, factor Xa, porcine pancreatic trypsin [9], and human cathepsin G. C. echinata elastase inhibitor (CeEI) inhibits human neutrophil elastase, plasma kallikrein, and cathepsin G, porcine pancreatic elastase and bovine pancreatic chymotrypsin [10]. Inhibitory activity of these molecules upon proteolytic enzymes has been used to study and disclose molecular events involved in a lung edema model, paw edema, and inhibition of cell proliferation in a melanoma model (unpublished data).

It has been recognized that plant protease inhibitors belonging to Kunitz and Bowman-Birk trypsin inhibitor families [11] function as storage proteins in seeds. These proteins are essential for seed germination and normal plant development. The early initiation of storage protein mobilization occurs through the active proteases, such as cysteine, serine, aspartyl, or metallo proteases deposited, during seed maturation, in protein bodies and vacuoles. The start of storage protein mobilization indicates that the mechanisms protecting storage proteins against degradation during middle and late maturation have been overcome. However, only few experiments have been performed with isolated protein bodies to show if the incubation under appropriate conditions leads to the breakdown of internal proteins that could be attributed to the action of these proteases [12, 13]. Thus, we were interested to verify the existence of proteases from C. echinata seeds, similar to the ones described, which could be involved in mobilization of seed reserves of this leguminous during early growth. In the present work, we are reporting the purification and characterization of the first serine protease described in C. echinata seeds, named C. echinata serine protease (CeSP).

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Enzyme Purification

A crude enzyme preparation was obtained from C. echinata coatless dry seeds triturated and homogenized in 0.10 M Tris (purchased from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) buffer pH 7.5 (1 : 20, w/v). The homogenate was centrifuged for 30 min at 2,300 g and the supernatant was subjected to an (NH₄)₂SO₄ (purchased from Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) fractionation and allowed to stand overnight in cold. The resultant precipitated was recovered by centrifugation at the same conditions described above and dissolved in 50 mM Na₂HPO₄/NaH₂PO₄ (purchased from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) buffer, pH 7.0. Proteolytic activity was examined in the hydrolysis of H-D-prolyl-L-phenylalanyl-L-arginine-p-nitroaniline (H-D-Pro-Phe-Arg-pNA) (purchased from Chromogenix, Italy) that was used to monitor the purification procedure. The sample with proteolytic activity was applied to a HiTrap Phenyl column (purchased from GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Piscataway, NJ, USA) equilibrated in 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, 1.0 M (NH₄)₂SO₄. Proteins were eluted in stepwise procedure with (NH₄)₂SO₄ (0.95, 0.25, and 0.13 M) at a flow rate of 2.0 mL/min. The fractions with enzymatic activity were pooled, dialyzed against 20 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.5, and applied to a Resource Q anion exchange column (purchased from GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Piscataway, NJ, USA) equilibrated with 50 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.5. Proteins were eluted with a NaCl (purchased from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) gradient (0 to 0.50 M) at a flow rate of 2.0 mL/min. The fractions containing enzymatic activity were pooled and submitted to a gel filtration on a Superdex 75 column (purchased from GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Piscataway, NJ, USA) equilibrated with 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, 0.15 M NaCl, using blue dextran 2000 (2,000 kDa), BSA (67.0 kDa), ovalbumin (43.0 kDa), chymotrypsinogen A (25.0 kDa), and ribonuclease A (13.7 kDa) as standards (gel filtration calibration kit purchased from GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Proteins were eluted in the same buffer at a flow rate of 0.66 mL/min, and the active fraction was stored at −20°C for further analysis.

2.2. Protein Quantification

Protein content was quantified according to the Bradford method [14] and using a standard curve of bovine serum albumin (BSA, purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company Inc, Saint Louis, MO, USA).

2.3. Molecular Mass Determination

Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was performed on 12% slab gels according to Laemmli method [15]; the bands of reduced protein (50 μg) were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue, and compared to the molecular mass markers from Kaleidoscope Prestained Standards (purchased from Bio-Rad Laboratories Hercules, CA, USA).

2.4. Optimum pH and Thermal Stability Determination

The optimum pH for the protease activity was determined in the H-D-Pro-Phe-Arg-pNA hydrolysis in a mixture of buffers (50 mM acetate/borate/phosphate—all components purchased from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) to cover the pH range of 2.0 to 11.5. The enzyme (50 nM) was kept in each pH for 10 min at 37°C. After that, the substrate (0.40 mM) was added and the hydrolysis in each pH was followed by the absorbance at 405 nm ( 8,990 M⁻¹ cm⁻¹ [16]) for 20 min in a Synergy HT microplate reader (purchased from Biotek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA). For the thermal stability determination, the purified enzyme (50 nM) was first kept in 50 mM Tris buffer pH 7.1 for 30 min at different temperatures (20–60°C). Afterward, the temperature was kept at 37°C and H-D-Pro-Phe-Arg-pNA (0.40 mM) was added and the hydrolysis followed for 20 min at this temperature by the absorbance at 405 nm in the microplate reader.

2.5. Kinetic Characterization

Michaelis-Menten constants () for the protease activity were obtained in the hydrolysis of H-D-Pro-Phe-Arg-pNA, H-D-valyl-L-leucyl-L-lysine-p-nitroanilide (H-D-Val-Leu-Lys-pNA), and N-benzoyl-L-isoleucyl-L-glutamyl (γ-OR)-glycyl-L-arginine-p-nitroanilide (Bz-Ile-Glu(γ-OR)-Gly-Arg-pNA) (all purchased from Chromogenix, Italy). The enzyme (50 nM) was kept in 50 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.1, for 2 min at 37°C. After that, a specific substrate was added in different concentrations (0.020 mM to 1.2 mM) and the hydrolysis of each substrate was followed by the absorbance at 405 nm, for 30 min at 37°C in the microplate reader. Two different experiments were performed in triplicate. The mean ± SD was obtained by statistical analysis using the commercial program GraphPad Prism version 5 (GraphPad Softaware Inc, San Diego, CA, USA). One-way analysis of variance with Bonferroni posttest was used.

2.6. Salt Influence on Catalytic Activity

The influence of different anions on the enzyme activity was determined using NaCl, NaBr, NaI, Na₂SO₄, NaH₂PO₄, and NaC₂H₃O₂ (all purchased from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) in the range of 0.50 to 1.0 M in 50 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.1. The enzymatic assays were performed as described above. The influence of different cations was studied using KCl, NaCl, NH₄Cl, MgCl₂, and CaCl₂ (all purchased from Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) in the range of 0.10 to 0.70 M in the same conditions.

2.7. Inhibition of the Enzyme Activity

The effect of inhibitors on the protease amydolytic activity was tested incubating the enzyme (50 nM) with irreversible inhibitors as, N^α-tosyl-Phe chloromethyl ketone (TPCK—50.0 μM [17]), purchased from Fluka BioChemika (Saint Louis, MO, USA), L-trans-epoxysuccinyl-leucylamido-butane (E-64—5.0 μM [18]) purchased from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany), phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride (PMSF—0.50 mM [19]), or N^α-tosyl-Lys chloromethyl ketone (TLCK—50.0 μM [17]), both purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company Inc. (Saint Louis, MO, USA), in 50 mM Tris buffer pH 7.1, for 10 min at 37°C. The activity was also tested in the presence of reversible inhibitors as CeKI (21.5 and 215 nM [9]) purified by our group, benzamidine (0.50 and 4.0 mM [20]) purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company Inc., (Saint Louis, MO, USA), pepstatin A (1 μM [21]) purchased from USB (Cleveland, OH, USA), aprotinin (92 and 307 nM [22]), soybean trypsin inhibitor (SBTI: 49.8 and 498 nM [23]), or ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA: 1.0 and 10.0 mM [24]), all purchased from Calbiochem (Darmstadt, Germany), in 50 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.1, for 10 min at 37°C. After the preincubation, 0.40 mM H-D-Pro-Phe-Arg-pNA was added, and the substrate hydrolysis was followed for 30 min at 37°C at 405 nm in the microplate reader.

3. Results and Discussion

In the recent years, great efforts has been devoted to purification of plant proteases, which appear to be involved in several processes such as germination where specific degradation of cotyledon storage proteins occurs [25]. Also, they are thought to be useful toward understanding of several mechanisms at the subcellular level.

This work focuses on the isolation and characterization of a protease of C. echinata seeds—CeSP. The crude protease was obtained by precipitation on 40% (NH₄)₂SO₄. Purification to homogeneity was achieved by hydrophobic interaction and anion exchange chromatographies (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)) and gel filtration (Figure 1(c)). The details of the purification analysis are summarized in Table 1. The specific activity of the purified enzyme was high (8,424 U/mg) as compared to the activity in the crude extract (176 U/mg). The total recovery of the activity was 8.2%. Besides, the enzyme was purified 47.8-fold.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 1

Elution profile of CeSP purification. (a) Hydrophobic interaction chromatography, where a Hitrap Phenyl column was equilibrated with 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, 1.0 M (NH₄)₂SO₄, and proteins were eluted with (NH₄)₂SO₄ (0.95, 0.25, and 0.13 M). (b) Anion exchange chromatography, where a Resource Q column was equilibrated with 50 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.5, and proteins were eluted with a linear NaCl (0 to 0.50 M) gradient. (c) Gel filtration, where a Superdex 75 column was equilibrated with 50 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, 0.15 M NaCl, and proteins were eluted in the same buffer. Inset: molecular masses as function of protein elution. Standard proteins: BSA (67.0 kDa), ovalbumin (43.0 kDa), chymotrypsinogen A (25.0 kDa) and ribonuclease A (13.7 kDa). All fractions were monitored by the absorbance at 280 nm (●) and enzymatic activity (°).

Although the molecular mass of plant serine proteases varies from 19 to 110 kDa, the majority lies between 60 and 80 kDa [26]. CeSP was showen to be a 61-kDa-protein, estimated in gel filtration on Superdex 75 (Figure 1(c) inset), and confirmed in SDS-PAGE (Figure 2). This value is similar to other serine proteases as dubiumin from Solanum dubium seeds (66 kDa) [27], serine endopeptidase from Melothria japonica fruits (61 kDa) [28], cucumisin from melon fruits (67 kDa) [29], trypsin-like protease from soybean seeds (59 kDa) [2], and two hydrolases from pea seeds (65 kDa) [30].

The enzyme activity was tested in the hydrolysis of some synthetic substrates. H-D-Pro-Phe-Arg-pNA, Bz-Ile-Glu(γ-OR)-Gly-Arg-pNA and H-D-Val-Leu-Lys-pNA were hydrolyzed by CeSP (Table 2). Z-Phe-Arg-pNA and Tosil-Gly-Pro-Arg-pNA were also hydrolyzed, but no N-Suc-Phe-pNA, N-Suc-Ala-Ala-Ala-pNA nor MeO-Suc-Ala-Ala-Pro-Val-pNA (data not shown). This fact shows the preference of the enzyme for basic amino acid residues (Arg or Lys) in P₁ position, and aromatic residue (Phe) in P₂ position. Similar results have already obtained [3, 4].

About optimum pH and thermal stability, CeSP behaves as other described seed proteases. It exhibits a neutral optimum pH of 7.1 (Figure 3(a)) similar to a protease from soybean seeds, which works at pH 8.0 cleaving between two Arg residues, in the hydrolysis of β-conglycinin, a storage protein [31]. CeSP effectively retains its activity toward H-D-Pro-Phe-Arg-pNA hydrolysis at a temperature range of 20 to 50°C (Figure 3(b)), and this profile is similar to serine proteases from Cucumis melo [32], Trichosants kirilowi [33], Hordeum vulgare [34], and another leguminous seeds [3, 4].

(a)

(b)

The effect of ions on protein stability may be caused by chemical interactions between proteins and ions to form complexes. The ion specificity was mostly attributed to the ion ability to modify the water structure, thus influences the protein hydration environment. It has been realized that an optimal stabilization of enzymes could be achieved through the use of salts with kosmotropic anions and chaotropic cations [35]. Then, the effect of Hofmeister series on enzyme stability was determined in the enzyme activity in presence of the different salts. The enzyme remained stable in the presence of NaH₂PO₄, Na₂SO₄, NaC₂H₃O₂, and NaCl, losing its activity in the presence of NaBr and NaI (Figure 4(a)). With the exception of chloride, the pattern of ionic interaction followed the Hofmeister series of salt hydration— [35]. The cations influence in the enzyme activity was also studied. CeSP remained stable in the presence of KCl, NaCl, and MgCl₂, losing its activity in the presence of NH₄Cl and CaCl₂ (Figure 4(b)). With the exception of ammonium ion, the pattern of ionic interaction followed the Hofmeister series of salt hydration— [35].

(a)

(b)

In addition to the presented parameters, inhibition studies can provide a first insight into the nature of the enzyme, its cofactor requirement, and the nature of active site. As shown in Table 3, the strongest inhibition (about 96%) was observed with TLCK, an irreversible inhibitor of serine proteases. It is possible that alkylation of His residue in CeSP by TLCK leads to chemical modification resulting in the inactivation of the specific active site, which is responsible for the cleavage at positively charged residues at P₁ positions of substrates, as reported by Imhoff and Keil-Dlouha [36]. CeSP was also inhibited by benzamidine (about 50%), an inhibitor of serine proteases, showing the CeSP affinity for Arg residues. So, these results may suggest that this protease is a serine protease.

As well as other serine proteases purified from leguminous seeds, C. lineata [4], C. ensiformis [3], and G. max [2], CeSP was not efficiently inhibited by protein inhibitors of serine proteases (aprotinin, SBTI, and CeKI), nor by PMSF (Table 3). Although these macromolecular inhibitors can affect activity of several serine proteases in animal physiological processes, they not necessarily inhibit correlated plant proteases. This result corroborates the fact that the proteins identified as protease inhibitors have others functions in seeds. Regarding to PMSF inability to block CeSP activity, it has been accepted that although serine proteases are structurally conserved enzymes, their catalytic triad may vary slightly and such a variation might account for the observed lack of inhibition of some serine proteases by PMSF.

To corroborate the hypothesis that CeSP is a serine protease, typical inhibitors of aspartyl, metallo, and cysteine protease were tested upon its activity. As shown in Table 3, these inhibitors had no effect on the enzyme activity, indicating that this enzyme did not belong to these classes of proteases.

The physiological role of the CeSP was not elucidated yet and additional experiments need to be performed to address this question. However, several reports have documented the involvement of different proteases in the mobilization and cleavage of seed storage proteins upon seed imbibition and germination, which is an essential step in the establishment of the seedling [37]. The protein cleavage makes possible subsequent extensive breakdown catalyzed by other proteases such as endo- and exopeptidases. The proteolytic enzymes that degrade the storage proteins during mobilization identified so far are mostly cysteine proteases [11], but also include serine [6], aspartic, and metallo proteases [38]. However, mobilization of storage protein involves several members of a protease family or members of different protease families, the protease responsible for the initial degradation appears to be a serine protease [5]. This evidence indicates CeSP as a potential enzyme involved in the initial steps of mobilization of storage protein, which would contribute to understanding how plants switch from synthesis and accumulation of storage proteins during development to hydrolysis of those proteins upon germination.

Besides addressing elementary questions in plant protein metabolism, studies of the mobilization of seed storage proteins by proteases open the perspective to understand, for example, how these enzymes could be applied toward reduction of food allergens, many of which are storage proteins.

4. Conclusion

This is the first report of the purification and characterization of a protease from Caesalpinia echinata Lam. seeds. The molecular mass and enzymatic characteristics were allowed us to classify it as a serine protease. The role of CeSP in the seeds cannot be assigned yet but is possible to infer that it is involved in the mobilization of seed storage protein.

Acknowledgments

This paper was partially supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brazil. The authors has no conflict of interests with any identities mentioned in this paper.

References

A. Schaller, “A cut above the rest: the regulatory function of plant proteases,” Planta, vol. 220, no. 2, pp. 183–197, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Nishikata, “Trypsin-like protease from soybean seeds. purification and some properties,” Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 1169–1177, 1984.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Oshikawa, K. -I. Aoki, Y. Yoshino, and S. Terada, “Purification and characterization of a basic amino acid-specific peptidase from seeds of jack bean (Canavalia ensiformis),” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 2186–2192, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
D. R. Demartini, A. Wlodawer, and C. R. Carlini, “A comparative study of the expression of serine proteinases in quiescent seeds and in developing Canavalia ensiformis plants,” Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 521–532, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Qi, K. A. Wilson, and A. L. Tan-Wilson, “Characterization of the major protease involved in the soybean β-conglycinin storage protein mobilization,” Plant Physiology, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 725–733, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
K. A. Wilson and A. L. Tan-Wilson, “Characterization of the proteinase that initiates the degradation of the trypsin inhibitor in germinating mung beans (Vigna radiata),” Plant Physiology, vol. 84, pp. 93–98, 1987.
View at: Google Scholar
V. Beilinson, O. V. Moskalenko, D. S. Livingstone, S. V. Reverdatto, R. Jung, and N. C. Nielsen, “Two subtilisin-like proteases from soybean,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 585–597, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Varty, Caesalpinia echinata. In: IUCN 2011. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2011.1, 2011, http://www.iucnredlist.org/.
I. Cruz-Silva, A. J. Gozzo, V. A. Nunes et al., “A proteinase inhibitor from Caesalpinia echinata (pau-brasil) seeds for plasma kallikrein, plasmin and factor XIIa,” Biological Chemistry, vol. 385, no. 11, pp. 1083–1086, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Araujo and I. Cruz-Silva, “Compostos bioativos de sementes de pau-brasil,” in Pau-Brasil da Semente à Madeira. Conhecer Para Conservar, R. C. Figueiredo-Ribeiro, Ed., pp. 51–56, Instituto de Botânica/SMA, São Paulo, Brazil, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Papastortsis and K. A. Wilson, “Initiation of the degradation of the Soybean Kunitz and Bowman-Birk trypsin inhibitors by a cysteine protease,” Plant Physiology, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 1086–1092, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Mitsuhashi and A. Oaks, “Development of endopeptidase activities in maize (Zea mays L.) endosperms,” Plant Physiology, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 401–407, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Wrobel and B. L. Jones, “Appearance of endoproteolytic enzymes during the germination of Barley,” Plant Physiology, vol. 100, no. 3, pp. 1508–1516, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
M. M. Bradford, “A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 72, no. 1-2, pp. 248–254, 1976.
View at: Google Scholar
U. K. Laemmli, “Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4,” Nature, vol. 227, no. 5259, pp. 680–685, 1970.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. F. Erlanger, N. Kokowsky, and W. Cohen, “The preparation and properties of two new chromogenic substrates of trypsin,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 271–278, 1961.
View at: Google Scholar
J. M. Griscavage, S. Wilk, and L. J. Ignarro, “Serine and cysteine proteinase inhibitors prevent nitric oxide production by activated macrophages by interfering with transcription of the inducible NO synthase gene,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 215, no. 2, pp. 721–729, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Barrett, A. A. Kembhavi, and M. A. Brown, “L-trans-Epoxysuccinyl-leucylamido(4-guanidino)butane (E-64) and its analogues as inhibitors of cysteine proteinases including cathepsins, B, H and L,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 201, no. 1, pp. 189–198, 1982.
View at: Google Scholar
M. O. Lively and J. C. Powers, “Specificity and reactivity of human granulocyte elastase and cathepsin G, porcine pancreatic elastase, bovine chymotrypsin and trypsin toward inhibition with sulfonyl fluorides,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 525, no. 1, pp. 171–179, 1978.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Markwardt, H. Landmann, and P. Walsmann, “Comparative studies on the inhibition of trypsin, plasmin, and thrombin by derivatives of benzylamine and benzamidine,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 502–506, 1968.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Umezawa, “Structures and activities of protease inhibitors of microbial origin,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 45, no. C, pp. 678–695, 1976.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Azougagh Oualane, F. Toulemonde, F. Doutremepuich, and C. Doutremepuich, “Effects of aprotinin on heparin activities and heparin neutralization with protamine,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 185–193, 1992.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Frattali and R. F. Steiner, “Soybean inhibitors—I. Separation and some properties of three inhibitors from commercial crude soybean trypsin inhibitor,” Biochemistry, vol. 7, pp. 521–530, 1968.
View at: Google Scholar
J. C. Powers and J. W. Harper, “Inhibitors of metalloproteases,” in Proteinase Inhibitors, A. J. Barrett and G. Salvesen, Eds., pp. 219–300, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1986.
View at: Google Scholar
K. A. Wilson, G. Papastoitsis, P. Hartl, and A. L. Tan-Wilson, “Survey of the proteolytic activities degrading the Kunitz trypsin inhibitor and glycinin in germinating soybeans (Glycine max),” Plant Physiology, vol. 88, pp. 355–360, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
C. M. Antão and F. X. Malcata, “Plant serine proteases: biochemical, physiological and molecular features,” Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 637–650, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. A. Mohamed Ahmed, I. Morishima, E. E. Babiker, and N. Mori, “Dubiumin, a chymotrypsin-like serine protease from the seeds of Solanum dubium Fresen,” Phytochemistry, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 483–491, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Uchikoba, S. Hosoyamada, M. Onjyo, K. Arima, H. Yonezawa, and M. Kaneda, “A serine endopeptidase from the fruits of Melothria japonica (Thunb.) Maxim,” Phytochemistry, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yamagata, T. Masuzawa, Y. Nagaoka, T. Ohnishi, and T. Iwasaki, “Cucumisin, a serine protease from melon fruits, shares structural homology with subtilisin and is generated from a large precursor,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 269, no. 52, pp. 32725–32731, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
J. B. Caldwell and L. G. Sparrow, “Partial purification and characterization of two peptide hydrolases from pea seeds,” Plant Physiology, vol. 57, pp. 795–798, 1976.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Morita, M. Fukase, K. Hoshino, Y. Fukuda, M. Yamaguchi, and Y. Morita, “A serine protease in soybean seeds that acts specifically on the native alpha subunit of beta-conglycinin,” Plant and Cell Physiology, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1049–1056, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Yamagata, S Ueno, and T. Iwasaki, “Isolation and characterization of a possible native cucumisin from developing melon fruits and its limited autolysis to cucumisin,” Agricultural and Biological Chemistry, vol. 53, pp. 1009–1017, 1989.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Uchikoba, H. Horita, and M. Kaneda, “Proteases from the sarcocarp of yellow snake-gourd,” Phytochemistry, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1879–1881, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Fontanini and B. L. Jones, “SEP-1—a subtilisin-like serine endopeptidase from germinated seeds of Hordeum vulgate L. cv. Morex,” Planta, vol. 215, no. 6, pp. 885–893, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhao, “Effect of ions and other compatible solutes on enzyme activity, and its implication for biocatalysis using ionic liquids,” Journal of Molecular Catalysis B, vol. 37, no. 1–6, pp. 16–25, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Imhoff and V. Keil-Dlouha, “On the complex formation between basic pancreatic trypsin inhibitor and TLCK-, TPCK-derivatives of β-trypsin,” FEBS Letters, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 345–348, 1971.
View at: Google Scholar
A. L. Tan-Wilson and K. A. Wilson, “Mobilization of seed protein reserves,” Physiologia Plantarum, In press.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Belozersky, Y. E. Dunaevsky, and N. E. Voskoboynikova, “Isolation and properties of a metalloproteinase from buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) seeds,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 272, no. 3, pp. 677–682, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2012 Priscila Praxedes-Garcia et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies