The Scientific World Journal

Research Article

Using Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Approach for Assessing the Risk of Railway Reconstruction Project in Taiwan

Table 9

The occurrence likelihood and degree of risk for each risk factor.


	Likelihood TFNs	Likelihood BNPs	Likelihood ranking	Degree of risk	Risk ranking


	(0.53, 0.63, 0.70, 0.79)	0.662	6	0.020	17
	(0.51, 0.61, 0.66, 0.76)	0.637	10	0.023	3
	(0.67, 0.77, 0.82, 0.90)	0.787	1	0.031	1
	(0.51, 0.61, 0.67, 0.76)	0.636	13	0.018	22


	(0.43, 0.53, 0.57, 0.67)	0.552	30	0.017	27
	(0.51, 0.61, 0.66, 0.76)	0.637	11	0.020	14
	(0.45, 0.55, 0.62, 0.71)	0.583	24	0.017	29
	(0.52, 0.62, 0.68, 0.78)	0.650	8	0.021	9


	(0.53, 0.63, 0.67, 0.77)	0.650	9	0.022	6
	(0.51, 0.61, 0.66, 0.76)	0.637	12	0.020	15
	(0.46, 0.56, 0.62, 0.72)	0.591	20	0.018	23
	(0.50, 0.60, 0.65, 0.75)	0.624	15	0.021	13


	(0.47, 0.57, 0.61, 0.71)	0.593	19	0.021	11
	(0.55, 0.65, 0.70, 0.80)	0.673	5	0.023	4
	(0.57, 0.67, 0.72, 0.81)	0.692	3	0.024	2
	(0.44, 0.54, 0.59, 0.69)	0.565	28	0.017	28
	(0.43, 0.53, 0.59, 0.69)	0.559	29	0.019	21
	(0.48, 0.58, 0.64, 0.74)	0.610	16	0.021	12


	(0.48, 0.58, 0.63, 0.72)	0.602	18	0.020	16
	(0.51, 0.61, 0.67, 0.76)	0.636	14	0.020	18
	(0.45, 0.54, 0.61, 0.71)	0.580	25	0.016	31
	(0.52, 0.62, 0.69, 0.78)	0.653	7	0.022	8


	(0.44, 0.54, 0.60, 0.70)	0.572	26	0.019	19
	(0.46, 0.56, 0.61, 0.71)	0.585	23	0.018	25
	(0.49, 0.59, 0.62, 0.72)	0.604	17	0.019	20
	(0.44, 0.54, 0.59, 0.69)	0.565	27	0.018	26
	(0.46, 0.56, 0.61, 0.71)	0.585	22	0.021	10


	(0.61, 0.71, 0.77, 0.85)	0.735	2	0.023	5
	(0.56, 0.65, 0.71, 0.80)	0.680	4	0.022	7
	(0.43, 0.52, 0.57, 0.67)	0.547	31	0.016	30
	(0.47, 0.57, 0.61, 0.71)	0.591	21	0.018	24