A Heuristic Ranking Approach on Capacity Benefit Margin Determination Using Pareto-Based Evolutionary Programming Technique

Table 5

Pareto optimal front of CBM values for each area.

EP run	Assisted area 1		Assisting area 2		Assisting area 3
	CBM MW	LOLE hrs/yr	CBM MW	LOLE hrs/yr	CBM MW	LOLE hrs/yr
1	114	2.3997	63	1.0646	51	2.0485
2	117	2.3627	69	1.1475	48	1.8874
3	117	2.3794	73	1.1739	44	1.731
4	121	2.3967	85	1.2913	36	1.4705
5	117	2.3656	70	1.1458	47	1.9693
6	117	2.3723	71	1.1237	46	1.8714
7	116	2.3867	70	1.1458	46	1.8714
8	116	2.3941	71	1.1237	45	1.7887
9	118	2.3641	74	1.1847	44	1.731
10	118	2.3667	76	1.2076	42	1.6394
11	121	2.3996	86	1.3183	35	1.431
12	122	2.3785	86	1.3183	36	1.4705
13	125	2.3411	90	1.3775	35	1.431
14	121	2.3954	84	1.2902	37	1.539
15	122	2.3766	85	1.2913	37	1.539
16	124	2.3534	90	1.3775	34	1.3913
17	123	2.3695	90	1.3775	33	1.3569
18	123	2.3711	91	1.3914	32	1.2769
19	122	2.3931	93	1.428	29	1.2597
20	128	2.3248	102	1.5166	26	1.1351
21	125	2.3697	102	1.5166	23	1.0929
22	131	2.3091	110	1.6479	21	1.0247
23	132	2.3999	112	1.7002	20	1.0107
24	133	2.3934	113	1.7095	20	1.0107
25	132	2.3985	114	1.7198	18	0.9511
26	134	2.373	116	1.7116	18	0.9511
27	133	2.3841	116	1.7116	17	0.9235
28	136	2.3455	119	1.7702	17	0.9235
29	132	2.3932	121	1.8074	11	0.8044