Research Article

Morphological Study of Root Canals of Maxillary Molars by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Table 5

Distribution of the different morphological types proposed by Vertucci [15] for mesiobuccal roots, distobuccal roots, and palatal roots according to sex, age group, and dental arch of the patient evaluated.

Mesiobuccal roots according to sex, age group, and dental arch of the patient evaluatedSexAge groupArch

Vertucci classificationMale (n = 438)Female (n = 562)Children (n = 28)Adults (n = 845)Middle-aged (n = 114)Older adults (n = 13)Right (n = 505)Left (n = 495)
Type I20110002
(0.5%)(0.0%)(3.6%)(0.1%)(0.0%)(0.0%)(0.0%)(0.4%)

Type II45180045
(0.9%)(0.9%)(3.6%)(0.9%)(0.0%)(0.0%)(0.8%)(1.0%)

Type III391101057
(0.7%)(1.6%)(3.6%)(1.2%)(0.9%)(0.0%)(1.0%)(1.4%)

Type IV311373215728110332352
(71.0%)(66.4%)(75.0%)(67.7%)(71.1%)(76.9%)(65.7%)(71.1%)

Type V0 (0.0%)1 (0.2%)0 (0.0%)1 (0.1%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)0 (0.0%)1 (0.2%)

Type VI27 (6.2%)56 (10.0%)1 (3.6%)73 (8.6%)8 (7.0%)1 (7.7%)42 (8.3%)41 (8.3%)

Type VII10 (2.3%)19 (3.4%)2 (7.1%)22 (2.6%)4 (3.5%)1 (7.7%)15 (3.0%)14 (2.8%)

Type VIII81 (18.5%)99 (17.6%)1 (3.6%)158 (18.7%)20 (17.5%)1 (7.7%)107 (21.2%)73 (14.7%)

p value10.114-0.146
Distobuccal roots according to sex, age group, and dental arch of the patient evaluated
Vertucci classificationSexAge groupArch
Male (n = 438)Female (n = 562)Children (n = 28)Adults (n = 845)Middle-aged (n = 114)Older adults (n = 13)Right (n = 505)Left (n = 495)
Type I1924333702122
(4.3%)(4.3%)(10.7%)(3.9%)(6.1%)(0.0%)(4.2%)(4.4%)

Type II22031031
(0.5%)(0.4%)(0.0%)(0.4%)(0.9%)(0.0%)(0.6%)(0.2%)

Type III1931341602030
(4.3%)(5.5%)(10.7%)(4.9%)(5.3%)(0.0%)(4.0%)(6.1%)

Type IV1531929285456182163
(34.9%)(34.2%)(32.1%)(33.7%)(39.5%)(46.2%)(36.0%)(32.9%)

Type V2 (0.5%)5 (0.9%)0 (0.0%)6 (0.7%)1 (0.9%)0 (0.0%)3 (0.6%)4 (0.8%)

Type VI114 (26.0%)146 (26.0%)3 (10.7%)227 (26.9%)27 (23.7%)3 (23.1%)136 (26.9%)124 (25.1%)

Type VII112 (25.6%)135 (24.0%)10 (35.7%)209 (24.7%)24 (21.1%)4 (30.8%)122 (24.2%)125 (25.3%)

Type VIII17 (3.9%)27 (4.8%)0 (0.0%)41 (4.9%)3 (2.6%)0 (0.0%)18 (3.6%)26 (5.3%)

p value10.956-0.531
Palatal roots according to sex, age group, and dental arch of the patient evaluated
Vertucci classificationSexAge groupArch
Male (n = 438)Female (n = 562)Children (n = 28)Adults (n = 845)Middle-aged (n = 114)Older adults (n = 13)Right (n = 505)Left (n = 495)
Type I12114511218343129137
(27.6%)(25.8%)(39.3%)(25.8%)(29.8%)(23.1%)(25.5%)(27.7%)

Type II8901610710
(1.8%)(1.6%)(0.0%)(1.9%)(0.9%)(0.0%)(1.4%)(2.0%)

Type III699151341838575
(15.8%)(16.2%)(17.9%)(15.9%)(15.8%)(23.1%)(16.8%)(15.2%)

Type IV3656083815141
(8.2%)(10.0%)(0.0%)(9.8%)(7.0%)(7.7%)(10.1%)(8.3%)

Type V61201620126
(1.4%)(2.1%)(0.0%)(1.9%)(1.8%)(0.0%)(2.4%)(1.2%)

Type VI567741111535875
(12.8%)(13.7%)(14.3%)(13.1%)(13.2%)(23.1%)(11.5%)(15.2%)

Type VII1321598245353150141
(30.1%)(28.3%)(28.6%)(29.0%)(30.7%)(23.1%)(29.7%)(28.5%)

Type VIII1013022101310
(2.3%)(2.3%)(0.0%)(2.6%)(0.9%)(0.0%)(2.6%)(2.0%)

p value20.929-0.406

1Fisher’s exact test; 2chi-squared test for homogeneity.