Research Article
The Validity and Reliability of Automatic Tooth Segmentation Generated Using Artificial Intelligence
Table 5
Difference between CephX, DICOM, and IOS for the upper and lower teeth in the mesiodistal aspect.
| Mesiodistal | Tooth no. | CephX | DICOM | IOS | Sig. | ICC | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | CephX-DICOM | CephX-IOS | DICOM-IOS |
| Maxilla | 1 | 8.78 | 0.40 | 8.54 | 0.45 | 8.69 | 0.73 | 0.793 | 0.839 | 0.842 | 0.836 | 2 | 6.78 | 0.41 | 6.50 | 0.40 | 6.69 | 0.39 | 0.538 | 0.457 | 0.691 | 0.848 | 3 | 7.71 | 0.57 | 7.68 | 0.31 | 7.85 | 0.80 | 0.897 | 0.853 | 0.907 | 0.639 | 4 | 7.28 | 0.47 | 7.07 | 0.40 | 7.26 | 0.65 | 0.784 | 0.896 | 0.812 | 0.871 | 5 | 6.66 | 0.24 | 6.66 | 0.22 | 6.55 | 0.27 | 0.712 | 0.866 | 0.534 | 0.718 | 6 | 10.50 | 0.85 | 10.48 | 0.51 | 10.48 | 0.79 | 0.998 | 0.658 | 0.919 | 0.755 | 7 | 10.08 | 0.46 | 9.72 | 0.37 | 10.29 | 0.65 | 0.243 | 0.585 | 0.838 | 0.546 |
| Mandible | 1 | 4.93 | 0.38 | 5.30 | 0.28 | 5.37 | 0.48 | 0.198 | 0.352 | 0.703 | 0.659 | 2 | 5.52 | 0.51 | 5.71 | 0.25 | 5.90 | 0.35 | 0.333 | 0.664 | 0.759 | 0.663 | 3 | 6.97 | 0.68 | 6.84 | 0.64 | 6.98 | 0.66 | 0.931 | 0.887 | 0.971 | 0.951 | 4 | 6.77 | 0.59 | 6.89 | 0.61 | 7.16 | 0.50 | 0.559 | 0.938 | 0.844 | 0.809 | 5 | 7.10 | 0.34 | 7.14 | 0.61 | 7.13 | 0.50 | 0.989 | 0.555 | 0.848 | 0.917 | 6 | 10.82 | 1.15 | 11.24 | 0.80 | 11.02 | 0.62 | 0.757 | 0.896 | 0.783 | 0.926 | 7 | 10.77 | 0.82 | 11.19 | 0.61 | 10.36 | 1.01 | 0.241 | 0.937 | 0.691 | 0.655 |
| Total agreement (ICC) | 0.741 | 0.796 | 0.771 |
|
|