Research Article
Measurement of Objective Video Quality in Social Cloud Based on Reference Metric
Table 1
Comparison of related work.
| Author | Techniques | Analysis | Description |
| Wang et al. [20] | SSIM | VQEG phase I | Performance as PCC = 0969, SROCC = 0.966, RMSE = 4.91 and OR = 1.16. | Pessoa et al. [21] | DSIS | MPEG-2 coded, five natural scene clipsITU-60 PAL format (57 × 720) interlaced, 4 : 2 : 2 display ratio sampling to 65 sequences | Accuracy measured MAE less than 4%. | Watson et al. [22] | DVQ, DCT, DSCQS | Carphone sequence | Results show the RMSE = 14.61. | Xiao [23] | DCT, JNDs | Block and blur errors | Methods show better performance than RMSE | Ndjiki-Nya et al. [24] | DMOS | — | Compare PCC, but better to PSNR. | Chandler and Hemami [25] | VSNR | Live image database | Accuracy measured of PCC and SROCC = 0.889 and RMSE = 7.39 | Laghri et al. [27] | MOS | Subjective assessment | Measured the accuracy of different video file formats |
|
|