Research Article
[Retracted] Research on Tourism Route Planning Based on Artificial Intelligence Technology
Table 2
Quality evaluation of tourism experience and weight allocation of index Hugh factors.
| To evaluate the total target layer | Evaluation of the project layer | Weight | Evaluation factor layer | Weight | Total ranking |
| | Total ranking | 0.23 | Convenient degree (C11) | 0.44 | 0.0217 | Punctuality (C12) | 0.36 | 0.0644 | Punctuality (C12) | 0.2 | 0.1399 | Tourism experience quality evaluation | Travel and catering (B2) | 0.15 | Feature (C21) | 0.38 | 0.1210 | Tariff (C22) | 0.30 | 0.146 | Handy (C23) | 0.32 | 0.1002 | | Travel accommodation (B3) | 0.14 | Tariff (C31) | 0.27 | 0.0055 | Handy (C32) | 0.32 | 0.1297 | Comfort (C33) | 0.45 | 0.1427 | | Tourist attraction (B4) | 0.30 | Image of the scenic spot (C41) | 0.32 | 0.1037 | Management and service (C42) | 0.38 | 0.1158 | | Travel shopping (B5) | 0.18 | Local specialty characteristics (C51) | 0.43 | 0.0599 | Tariff (C52) | 0.35 | 0.1001 | Handy (C53) | 0.22 | 0.026 |
|
|