Review Article
Signal Propagation Models in Soil Medium for the Study of Wireless Underground Sensor Networks: A Review of Current Trends
Table 2
Comparison between IoUT communication technologies: EM, MI, and acoustic.
| Parameters | EM | MI | Acoustic |
| Transmission range | Few meters | In 10s of meters | In 100s of meters | Attenuation | High | Low | High | Interference | High | Low | Medium | Installation cost | Moderate | Medium | Medium | Data rate | In bps | In kbps | In 10s of bps | Application | Agriculture, seismic exploration, intrusion detection, buried pipeline monitoring (oil and gas, water), downhole telemetry | Downhole telemetry | Seismic exploration, buried pipeline monitoring, downhole telemetry | Advantages | High data rate compared to acoustic systems, easy to install, support multihop communication | The high data rate, low attenuation, and support multihop communication | High data rate compared to MPT systems, long transmission range | Disadvantages | High attenuation and interference, limited transmission range, and requires a large antenna | The orientation between coils is required; limited transmission range needs dense deployment | High attenuation and lower data rate than EM and MI |
|
|